I ask this question with the purpose to help answering the debatable question, "Does a true current source exist?" We continuosly come across it when discussing the questions about the basic electrical quantities voltage and current:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_do_we_prefer_using_voltage_than_current_as_a_data_carrier_in_electronics_Why_are_most_of_electronic_devices_implemented_as_voltage_converters

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_current_source_Are_there_true_current_sources_If_not_how_do_we_create_artificial_current_sources_How_do_we_make_them_perfect

https://www.researchgate.net/post/why_we_are_preferring_the_BJT_transistors_and_why_not_FET_transistors?

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Do_current_sources_exist

IMO both they are a kind of "temporary" (exhausting) sources (initially empty containers). Good examples (analogies) of such a "temporary" pressure source are a wound spring, compressed air and a water column; an examples of a "temporary" flow source are a moving inert body and a flywheel; in a pendulum they interact each other. An LC tank is a good illustration of interacting "temporary" electric sources:

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Circuit_Idea/How_do_We_Create_Sinusoidal_Oscillations%3F

Once charged (the capacitor - with a kind of potential energy and the inductor - with a kind of kinetic energy), they begin acting as sources that gradually deplete the initially stored energy. It is interesting that these kind of sources have only an output (1-port device)... they are not energy converters... and if we forget about their limited continuation, we can begin thinking of them as of a kind of "perpetuum mobile"-:) From this viewpoint, they are "true" sources justifying the name "source". So, my conclusion is: A TRUE BUT "TEMPORAL" CURRENT SOURCE REALLY EXISTS!

In contrast, "true" (electrical) sources actually are not sources; they are converters having input and output (2-port devices) continuously converting the input energy into output one. If the output (produced) energy is potential, we name them "pressure" ("voltage") sources; if the output energy is kinetic, we name them "flow" ("current") sources. From this viewpoint, and relying on the natural symmetry, we can consider as above that there are also two kinds of true "continuous" electrical sources - a voltage source and a current source. Note that making this conclusion, we do not interest in the kind of the input (external) energy. It seems I can make again the same conclusion as above: A TRUE "CONTINUOS" CURRENT SOURCE SHOULD EXIST!? Am I right?

So, we have a "temporary" voltage source, a "temporary" current source, a "continuous" voltage source and we suppose the existence of a "continuous" current source. Following the lead of Prof Chua, we can write an intriguing scientific article with the provoking title of "The missing fourth electrical source"-:) Thus we will produce a scientific sensation with the hope to share his glory-:)

More Cyril Mechkov's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions