In the context of accelerating the development of industry, global production, exploitation of raw materials, pollutants and waste emissions, increasing greenhouse gas emissions, accelerating the global warming process, protection of the natural environment, natural ecosystems, nature protection and biodiversity is one of the main challenges of the 21st century.
In view of the above, what do you think are the most effective methods, technologies, instruments for nature protection, natural ecosystems and biodiversity currently?
Please reply
Best wishes
Understanding nature and surrounding environment is one of the most important steps before any methods are adopted for conservation of nature. So, we should learn effective measures to conserve biodiversity from many of the indigenous people from different parts of the earth.
Dear Dariuzh, long time ago I published one article named Universal nature conservation: the main precondition of sustainable development of the region of the Tisza river basin. It belongs for the Tisza region but can be adopted except of some details everywhear.
This is complex problem and 8 main principles should be implemented in the area. I smwt modified this list:
1.Harmonization of the growing needs of society with nature through comprehensive protection, preservation and restoration of the environment.
2.Stable orientation to a gradual decrease in environmental pollution.
3.To prevent the negative impact of conservation measures on the welfare
of the population.
4.Understanding of all social layers of the area that improve the
standard of life is impossible only by increasing of incomes.
5.The perception of cooperation with neighboring States as one of the
most important factors in reducing the probability of catastrophic natural phenomena.
6.Approval of the regional community should be the essential basis of any large scale events related to the transformation of the environment.
7.Developments of effective mechanisms for the implementation of national environmental policies at the regional level.
8.Strengthening the role of environmental science and environmental institutions in solving problems of the province.
Andrey
As always, protected areas are the first defense against ongoing biodiversity loss. Involvement of local, regional, national, and global stakeholders (not just indigenous people) all play a part, especially in encouraging conservation ethics. Beware of strictly economic arguments for the conservation of biodiversity. These can be a slippery slope.
And increasingly, ecological restoration will also be a major contributor, especially in an era of global change.
Careful study of the environment in each area and preven from the destruction of environmental areas for construction, informing the public about the benefits of environmental protection and planning for the rational use of environmental facilities such as wind and natural green spaces and rich soils......
Biodiversity conservation, the practice of protecting and preserving the wealth and variety of species, habitats, ecosystems, and genetic diversity on the planet, is important for our health, wealth, food, fuel, and services we depend on. It plays an integral role in supporting many sectors of development
I think it all comes to efficient policies and political situation in the region. The most vulnerable areas are those where the political situation is unstable and economy is weak.
Useful papers about it:
Smirnova, O. V., Toropova N. A. Potential ecosystem cover – a new approach to conservation biology. - Russian Journal of Ecosystem Ecology. – 2016. – Vol. 1 (1). DOI: 10.21685/2500-0578- 2016-1-1
Smirnova O. V., Geraskina A. P., Aleynikov A. A. The concept "complementarity" as the basis for model and nature reconstruction of potential biota in the current climate. Russian Journal of Ecosystem Ecology. – 2018. – Vol. 3 (3). – DOI: 10.21685/2500-0578-2018-3-1
I think preventing encroachment and any kind of manipulation of wild landscapes or seascapes are of prime importance. This involves everything such as logging, poaching, building roads, tourism, industries, fishing, mining, dams, etc. Better to leave the biodiversity rich regions as wild as possible.
I would increase national reserves and national parks area, also encourage the creation of private reserves by creating the correct economic incentives for that. All abovementioned following a spatial distribuition order and under landscape ecological criteria. It is cheaper to buy marginal land and put it out of production than paying incentives to landholders to follow environmentally friendly practices.
Humanity has been branded the ultimate patch disturbance species - and the collective size of the disturbance we create grows inexorably with our increasing numbers as we push aside natural ecosystems, simplifying them in order to supply our requirements. I think the only long term solution to our ongoing encroachment into natural self sustaining ecosystems is to adopt the long term goal of shrinking human numbers to levels that can be sustained by renewable energy. NOTE: Our recent ( 200 year) access to non renewable energy has allowed us to exponentially increase our population, by expanding resource extractioin, agricultur, fisheries etc.,
Tout d’abord, il faut reconnaître que l’être humain ne pense qu’à satisfaire ses exigences, malheureusement qui non pas de fin. Le jour où il apprendra à aimer cette nature et à chercher les réponses (méthodes, techniques, agissement, comportement, respect…) dans son environnement naturel, notre belle et merveilleuse terre sera préservée.
Application of traditional ecological knowledge and sustainable utilisation of natural resources can also be helpful among others.
1. People within particular social units must come to a consensus on what challenges the part of the environment they occupy are facing.
2. The social contract within these social units must be strengthened by increases in transparency, wisdom, competency, generosity, and trust so that a level of cooperation adequate to make agreed upon changes is reached.
3. The populations within these social units must effectively resist the efforts of some to conquer/defeat the consensus of the group and impose their own will for their own gain.
None of these aims can be achieved without concerted focused effort and the acceptance of the necessary sacrifices. The size of the social units referred to here can be very small (like a family unit) to very large (like the international community), but the basic dynamics remain the same. The problem with addressing climate change is that it effects the entire international community and must be solved by the entire international community and, within the international community the dynamics referred to above are weak and stunted.
James Herbert just suggested that climate change is a problem that "must be solved by the entire international community"........ supposedly by curbing human emissions of carbon containing greenhouse gasses.
The following article puts the emissions from fossil fuel burning in perspective --- and renders attempts to decrease atmospheric concentrations of CO2 --- futile. .. as it states that "The grand total produced by all living things is estimated to be 440 billion tons per year, or 13 times the amount of carbon dioxide currently being produced by fossil-fuel emissions. Fossil-fuel emissions are less than 10 percent of biological emissions. Are you laughing yet?"
Read the article and weep.
https://www.westernjournal.com/global-warming-myth-debunked-humans-minimal-impact-atmospheres-carbon-dioxide-climate/
Your mocking tone is very unwelcome. If you think that global warming is not a problem, or perhaps is not even occurring, I suggest that you and others with a similar view do nothing.
My view is that rapid changes (it is all relative of course) in global temperatures make it difficult for species to evolve quickly enough to adapt leading to loss of biodiversity. I realize that not everyone agrees with that analysis.
I agree with you that, unless human population can be brought to a sustainable level nonhuman nature will continue to suffer.
Article Salient Ecological Sensitive Regions of Central Western Ghats, India
Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:
How to increase the effectiveness of environmental protection programs, natural ecosystems and biodiversity?
Protection of the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity should be an integral part of the concept of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?
In the context of growing and increasing environmental pollution and declining areas of natural ecosystems, the importance and need to improve environmental protection systems, natural ecosystems and biodiversity is increasing. Biodiversity is one of the most important issues of natural ecosystems and life on Earth. Maintaining high biodiversity on Earth should be a challenge and one of the main goals of human functioning on the Earth in the 21st century and in subsequent centuries.
In connection with the above, protection of the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity should be an integral part of the concept of sustainable ecological development. In some countries, the concept of sustainable pro-ecological economic development is implemented successively, primarily in the field of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation techniques and recycling development. However, in many countries these issues are still insufficiently developed.
Still too small financial resources are allocated in many countries for the development of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation and recycling techniques. In addition to the private sector, besides enterprises implementing ecological innovations, it is necessary to increase expenditures and develop strategic pro-ecological reform projects, including restructuring of the mining industry of minerals supplying classic energy sources and development of energy based on renewable energy sources. This development should be supported and coordinated by environmentally friendly state intervention, and due to the high investment costs of construction of power plants producing electricity from renewable energy sources should be co-financed from the state public finance funds.
In this way, it will be possible to slow down the ongoing global warming process in the 21st century and thus slow down the process of devastating the natural environment, draining green areas characterized by high biodiversity. Biodiversity is a very important issue in the context of the analysis of ecology, sustainable development and the protection of the natural environment, including, in particular, the natural positions of biologically complex ecosystems, i.e. those that are characterized by high biodiversity. Maintaining biodiversity of natural ecosystems is one of the most important problems and tasks for people in the 21st century.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In the context of the above considerations, the following question is still valid:
How to increase the effectiveness of environmental protection programs, natural ecosystems and biodiversity?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes
I should remind for colleagues the main goal of this discussion: "In your opinion, what are the most effective methods of nature protection and biodiversity currently?". The most effective means minimum finance and maximum effect, isn't it? We have different levels! Nature protection means improving of environment that is damaged locally, regionally and worldwide. Dariusz describing it perfectly in his posters/ Biodiversity protections (what & where) are measures in conservation areas. I have good experience in Indo-China. Eg, the Anak-Krakatau volcano area is 1a category Cons.a. but you are paying for -visiting it (about 100-200 USD per person) goes into the pockets of administration guiding & partially for park stuff. The same situation in Ujung Kulon and others... What to do? It is necessary to propose a long term Program for Indonesia of Administrative-Scientific advising of some model parks to show how parks can be self-effective in financial and scientific approaches. When starting should circle the main aims what and how to do... Give me such possibility and you will see the result even in one year! Ukraine is not far from Indonesia. Chiefs of the country are qualifying nature reserves like a form of enterprise mainly.
Andrey
https://www.peer.org/about-us/25th-anniversary/brian-czech-wrestling-the-800-pound-gorilla.html
This short video draws attention to the conflict between economic growth and consrvation,
How to increase the effectiveness of programs to protect the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity?
The human being has more or less arrived discussed that one should respect and accept the differences of thoughts and ideas. It is a step to be able to accept, before it is too late, the center of ecological engineering by a fight against these own actions and inventions.
Primo: Beginning to restore and rehabilitate natural ecosystems simply by "planting native species in the environment considered". Maybe it should be enough !!!
The proposed methods are:
- Agriculture: harvested at the plot level only the fruits or products to be consumed and leaving the root leaves in place. In addition, each parcel should be rested for a period of 3 years, for example.
- Forestry: reforest 3 times the area of timber harvested during the year.
- Industry: minimize inventing derivatives of products to consume.
- Creation of nature protection services companies with human labor (job creation and nature protection).
- Economy: put the products of bio qualities rather cheap at the availability of all. This will change the current economic system and encourage people to produce Bio with integrated Bio systems
How to increase the effectiveness of programs to protect the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity?
The root cause of damage to natural ecosystems and biodiversity is the ongoing expansion of the portion of the Earth occupied by the ultimate patch expasion species (humans). As human numbers increase the patches occupied by humanity expandand such that the disturbed patches coalesce -- leaving less and less habitat available for natural ecosystems and the biodiversity that is supported by these undisturbed natural ecosystems. In order to increase the effectiveness of programs to protect the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity, the increase in human numbers must cease and then a program to slowly decrease human numbers must be adopted to free up ever larger areas that will be allowed to redevelop the biodiversity that can only exist in the abscence of human interference.
Conservation of existing biodiversity regions and protected area and plantation in deforested area.
In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:
What do you think is the importance of biodiversity in natural ecosystems?
Biodiversity is diverse in virtually unlimited degree, which results from the essence of processes of evolution of species, filet lines and entire ecosystems. It is thanks to the millions of years of evolutionary processes on Earth that there are so many different natural and highly diverse ecosystems in which different species of flora, fauna, fungi and microorganisms adapt to life in different and very diverse geographical and climatic environments.
The largest biodiversity of ecosystems and species functions in natural environmental environments in which ecosystems have evolved without human impact through millions of years of climatic and geographical conditions enabling the development of various life forms. These types of high biodiversity sites can be found in unpolluted rainforest ecosystems in tropical forests, in temperate climates and in coral reefs.
Unfortunately, human civilization activity contributes to the successive and accelerating process of biodiversity reduction by dying out species of living organisms. The areas of natural natural ecosystems are decreasing, including those in which the greatest biodiversity is diagnosed, such as the rainforests of the Amazon. The protection of naturalistic ecosystems and thus the protection of the planet's biodiversity is the most important challenge for mankind in the 21st century.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
What do you think is the importance of biodiversity in natural ecosystems?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes
1/3 of global warming is caused by vehicle emissions. Using alternative methods for travel is an obvious way to take care of our planet. As my personal contribution to reduce global warming and show respect for our planet, I have been traveling by bicycle for 14 years. People who are able to not use a vehicle for transportation need to try alternatives whenever they can, and encourage others as well.
The biodiversity in the natural environment is very important to humanity because it provide stability to the ecosystem and maintains the ecological balance. Plants and animals in ecosystem are linked to each other through food chain and food web. The loss of one species in the ecosystem affects the survival of other species. In addition, biodiversity plays an important role in protecting the water resources. The natural vegetation cover in water catchment helps in maintaining hydrological cycles, regulating and stabilizing water runoff and acts as buffer against natural disasters like flood and drought.
Will the current SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (pandemic Covid-19) pandemic increase ecological awareness and increase the scale of biodiversity protection?
Biodiversity of natural ecosystems, including flora, fauna, fungi and other life forms on Earth is the greatest wealth of planet Earth, which has been created for billions of years. It would be a great loss, a paradoxical loss, even a surrealistic great loss not only of the planet Earth but of the entire solar system, if man had destroyed much of this biodiversity. Unfortunately, it is possible already at the end of the 21st century, if the global warming process progresses in the following years so quickly and in an accelerating process, as in previous years. Human responsibility towards nature is very high. The development of civilization caused an imbalance in natural ecosystems. The number of species of flora and fauna decreases rapidly from year to year. Biodiversity of biological ecosystems is reduced. Adverse effects of climate change in the form of drought, floods and others are becoming more frequent. The most forest fires occurred in 2019. Since the end of the 19th century, the average temperature at the Earth's surface has been gradually rising. Environmental pollution is rising. In recent years, there has been a particularly rapid increase in plastic pollution. Many results of research in the field of climatology and ecology confirm the accelerating greenhouse gas emissions in recent years, which is causing the faster and faster global warming process. With each collection year, there are more and more examples on the growing scale of imbalances in nature caused by the development of human civilization. In view of the above, human responsibility for the state of nature on planet Earth is very high. In view of the above, biodiversity in nature is important because it is most responsible for the ability of entire natural ecosystems to adapt to changing geological, climatic and environmental conditions. Biodiversity of natural ecosystems has been created for millions of years in nature, and now it is up to humans to decide what will happen in the future with biodiversity. Therefore, man should take care to preserve the current state of natural biodiversity to the greatest extent and to restore biodiversity in industrially degraded places. Currently, due to the development of the SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus pandemic causing Covid-19 disease, industrial production has fallen significantly in many places around the world due to falling demand and home quarantine. Consequently, environmental pollution has decreased in these regions of the world and greenhouse gas emissions have decreased. Perhaps the SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus epidemic will increase the importance and discussion on the protection of natural biodiversity, maintain balance in nature, protect nature and the need to implement sustainable development principles to limit and slow down adverse climate change processes.
What do you think about this topic?
Will the current SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (pandemic Covid-19) pandemic increase ecological awareness and increase the scale of biodiversity protection?
I am asking for an answer and invite you to a discussion,
Thank you and best regards, have a nice day
Dariusz Prokopowicz
In my opinion, in order to develop effective ways of protecting nature and biodiversity of natural ecosystems, it is necessary to increase the scale of the implementation of sustainable development goals, to raise the general social awareness of pro-environmental through media campaigns, to carry out a pro-ecological transformation of the economy towards a sustainable, green circular economy, to increase the scale of renewable natural resources , development of recycling, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, improvement of techniques for saving water resources, etc.
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Ecology and biodiversity is very important to be given focus immediately. It needs high and vast attention.
I have little explanation in my books Chapters of Science and between Mars and Venus. Some more works on going. In this Topic world must work jointly. Proposal on my profile.
Thank you for important topic mattersyou raise.
Some groups on this site utter non-sense with little idiotic questions, score seekiigs with group supports, provoking deeply what they come up here with their pre-nurtured attitudes/cultures.
People should ask questions for others input for direction and for share Interests, and so can raise discussions on relevant, timely associated matter of topics.
Any provoking against value systems shouldn't be encouraged, never score seeking questions to be promoted, mustn't be given attention to.
Here Also peers groups created, formed system of high score buildings, by certain social background of people where in their regions majority are under oppressions, deprivations and deprived of basic essentials, education to food/clothing and where segregated background clashes. They down talk to and provoking. They bring that culture to here.
Obviously not by those sufisticative Individuals' whom do hold valuable knowledge of faculty and respect, contributing, distributing and serious about work for betterment of society per making positive contribution of multi knowledge/tasks, not interested in mere position/title display either.
Remember in other question we talked about Skills quality people must take from education beside transferable knowledge. (Those, they do not. ).
Anyway, it Shouldn't be allowed to let this site be corrupted also like facebook, etc..
Many replies in this dicussion deal with the MODEL BASED FUTURE GLOBAL WARMING that will supposedly be caused by human emissions of carbon containing greenhouse gases.
I am offer for your perusal and edification Dr. Happer's March 25, 2021, presentation titled :
'CO₂ is not a Pollutant — Exposing the Fraud Behind the Global Reset/Green New Deal' ........see (CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING URL):
CO₂ is not a Pollutant — Exposing the Fraud Behind the Global Reset/Green New Deal - YouTube
..... however, it could be labelled............. 'A mandatory short course on climate for policy makers'.
Happer speaks for about 25 minutes with illustrative slides ..
Please take the time to watch AT LEAST the important physics presented by Happer stating at 12:30 ... and at about 12:30 Happer presents the rock-solid physics that show further additions of CO2 to the CURRENT atmosphere will have an insignificant effect on global warming.
His presentation is followed by a fascinating 15-minute summary of the decades-long history that led to the current misinformed climate alarmism, and the economically suicidal implications of President Biden's recent executive orders dealing with the climate and CO2 emissions.
Quoting some of Happer's statements:
“Policies to slow CO2 emissions are based on flawed computer models which exaggerate warming by factors of 2 or 3. “More CO2 is an overall benefit, so costly ‘mitigation’ schemes are harmful. We should have the courage to do nothing about CO2 emissions.”
I hope this helps in shining a new light on the climate discussion ... which almost certainly will be news to those of you who are being held captive by the currently predominant 'groupthink' concerning the supposed climate crisis/emergency and the touted necessity of curbing emissions of carbon containing greenhouse gases.
CO₂ is not a Pollutant — Exposing the Fraud Behind the Global Reset/Green New Deal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qhxj6GkWpE
Dear Fatema Miah, Peter Salonius,
Yes of course. CO2 emission is an important civilization factor responsible for the acceleration of the global warming process that has taken place over the last several dozen years. In addition to CO2, emissions of methane and other minor greenhouse gases are also increasing. On the other hand, the scale of environmental pollution with various wastes, toxic chemicals and plastics has also increased significantly over the last several decades. Therefore, it is necessary to create eco-technologies, eco-innovations and increase the scale of their application in order to counteract these adverse side effects of the development of civilization, i.e. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and pollute the environment with waste.
Thank you, Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Dear Dariusz Prokopowicz
As you persist in asserting that CO2 (and methane) are "responsible for the acceleration of the global warming process"...... I must assume that you have not taken the time to read and understand the ROCK SOLID physics presented by Dr. Happer....see:
CO₂ is not a Pollutant — Exposing the Fraud Behind the Global Reset/Green New Deal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qhxj6GkWpE
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts/agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
The most effective is also the most radical, the creation of protected areas (national Parks, reserves and local protected areas), by decolonizing these areas. When that is not possible, modern economic instruments like Payment for environmental services under binding contracts & agreements involving landholders
There are 10 /TEN copies of the relpy from Ricardo Gonzalez that are exactly the same.
One copy should be sufficient.
Dear Peter Salonius,
Thank you for participating in our discussion. You pointed out an interesting issue concerning the negation of the facts regarding greenhouse gas emissions and the progressing faster and faster global warming process, which has already been confirmed by min. 97 percent research carried out on a global scale. An interesting regularity that occurs in this matter is presented in such a way that when scientific research is conducted independently and concerns only facts, it shows obvious correlations.
Regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Dear Ricardo Gonzalez,
Yes, creating new green areas, including national parks, reserves, local protected areas, but also city parks, forests in areas devastated by civilization, industrially as part of reclamation and restoration of a state similar to natural natural ecosystems, the creation of flower meadows in cities, etc. is one of the types of pro-environmental activities and limiting the negative impact of the classical economy development on the natural environment.
Regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Dear Dariusz Prokopowicz
You referred to FACTS regarding the global warming process.....You must not have listened carefully to Dr. Happer's presentation VIDEO at:
CO₂ is not a Pollutant — Exposing the Fraud Behind the Global Reset/Green New Deal - YouTube
Dear Peter Salonius,
Thank you very much for the hint, for the tip on the interesting material related to the issues of improving techniques and systems for the protection of nature and biodiversity of natural ecosystems discussed in this discussion.
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Dear Lou Schmitt,
Thanks for answering the question:
In your opinion, what are the most effective methods of nature protection and biodiversity currently?
Thank you, Regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Dear Ricardo Gonzalez,
Yes. I fully agree. As part of nature protection, the area of strictly protected areas should be increased. Yes, environmental policy should be taken into account to a greater extent in the context of broadly understood socio-economic policy. These are important elements of the implementation of the goals of sustainable development and pro-environmental transformation of the economy.
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
I would say the involvement of the communities living in and around the habitat. If we convince them about the need for protecting the flora fauna and the ecosystem and help them feel responsible for the wellbeing of the habitat and everything in it, it gives them a sense of belonging and responsibility... this definitely leads to effective conservation.
I would also need to add the importance of research to determine the status of the habitat and the conservation measures needed to improve the quality of the habitat.
There is an absolute need for collaboration " working hand in hand" between the habitat communities and the researchers, each doing what they are best at.
thank you very much,
Smitha D Gnanaolivu
Dear Smitha D Gnanaolivu,
Yes. You indicated the key aspects of the need to increase general social awareness of pro-environmental and pro-environmental and ecological social responsibility.
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
encourage afforestation and effective conservation through public- private partnership
Dear Okeke Onyeka,
Yes. I fully agree. This is how afforestation programs should be developed and the scale of deforestation and deforestation should be limited, because this issue will largely determine the scale of the progressive global warming process and how future generations of people will be able to survive the future climate crisis. It is one of the key impact factors in terms of progressing climate change.
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Dear César,
Yes of course. Environmental education is one of the key factors in improving systems and increasing the scale of activities related to environmental protection, protection of the biosphere and climate of our planet.
Thank you,
Regards,
Dariusz
In my opinion, the most effective method of nature protection and biodiversity currently is creating awareness about it among all.
What we are doing to our world regarding our carbon footprint and global warming are effecting everything; living organisms and the landforms that life forms inhabit.
We are the only animals to blame; all the other living things are at our mercy.
Dear Mary,
Yes, I fully agree with you. Man-made greenhouse gas emissions are causing climate change, including the ongoing process of global warming. This process adversely affects the condition of the planet's biosphere, including it reduces the level of biodiversity of natural ecosystems. In addition, the deforestation process accelerates these unfavorable trends, which result in accelerating the process of global warming and the extinction of many species of flora and fauna. It is imperative to urgently carry out a pro-environmental transformation of the economy in order to build a sustainable, green, zero-emission zero-growth economy and a circular economy. The sooner this is done, the less degradation of the biosphere and climate will occur in the near future. This is a key goal of global environmental policy and to significantly reduce the level of future loss of biodiversity in natural ecosystems.
Thank you very much,
Kind regards,
Dariusz
Attention to environmental ethics, focus on the capacity of local communities and NGOs and Policy-making based on cosmopolitan ecology.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUMPLawAYbk/2001/7.pdf,kindly check this link.
In my opinion, the mass awareness is very important for the importance of nature. Tree plantation, no cutting of forest, conversion of fuel vehicles to electric vehicles, on-site treatment of wastewater and waste materials. Implementation of 3Rs, Reduce, Recycle, Reuse.
Dariusz continues to assert that "Man-made greenhouse gas emissions are causing climate change" in spite of massive evidence to the contrary.... see a brief explanation at:
Empirical observations show no sign of 'climate crisis' - The Global Warming Policy Foundation (thegwpf.org)
By Planting trees, we can save planet earth and we can protect biodiversity.
Dear Peter,
Yes, I still think so, and I will always do so because it is obvious. In a few decades, we will clearly see the direction in which climate change will take place and to what extent the process of global warming will be achieved. But then it will be too late for the concept of mitigating the scale of climate change, significantly slowing down the accelerating global warming process, ie what we can still do now. The issue of the impact of deforestation; industrial, energy, etc. emissions of greenhouse gases has a climate is obvious. This is confirmed by about 99 percent. research results published in thousands of scientific papers. This is confirmed, for example, by the reports of the IPCC, the results of which are referred to, inter alia, by the annual UN climate conferences COP. Climate is changing. The scale of negative effects of climate change on the biosphere and man is growing. The current debates on the scale of the impact of civilization development on climate change is an attempt to preserve the status quo of the devastating reality for the biosphere and climate of the civilization development model. This type of discussion was conducted several decades ago. At that time, questioning the negative impact of man on the climate and the biosphere resulted from the particular interests of supporting the development of the fossil fuel extractive industry, the energy industry producing energy based on the combustion of fossil fuels, the oil refining industry, etc. civilization, including greenhouse gas emissions for climate change, including, in particular, the generation of the global warming process, they only cause the continuation of the loss of time, more and more valuable and limited time, in which people can still, to a large extent, carry out the necessary pro-environmental transformation of the economy, develop renewable and zero-emission energy sources and reduce the scale, slow down the pace of global warming. Based on the results of numerous scientific studies, it is obvious that the key period is the next few to several years. What humanity can do at that time in terms of the pro-environmental transformation of the economy depends on the extent to which we save the world from the degradation of the climate and the biosphere, which may occur at the end of the current 21st century. I will probably not live until the end of the 21st century, but I think about future generations of people, I think about the future of the planet's biosphere and the possibility of civilization development in the future. What worries me is that many people have a selfish approach to these issues, that many people do not care what will happen in several dozen or more years.
Thank you,
Regards,
Dariusz
Dear Nazia,
That's right. The continued deforestation accelerates the global warming process. It is essential to end deforestation as soon as possible and to develop aforestation programs on a large scale. This is one of the key factors in saving the climate and the biosphere from much greater degradation than what has already been lost in this regard by the predatory exploitation of the planet's resources.
Thank you very much,
Kind regards,
Dariusz
Dariusz projects (model based).... "In a few decades, we will clearly see the direction in which climate change will take place. He and others should devote 40 minutes to understand the futility of such projections at:
Climate science 101 with David Siegel - YouTube
Dear Peter,
Dariusz's projects are based primarily on the facts of climate change that have been taking place for over two centuries. If in the coming decades man does not implement the pro-environmental transformation of the classic growth, brown, linear economy of excess into a sustainable, green, zero-emission economy of zero growth and a circular economy, then a critical and key period for a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, slowing down the progressing global warming process , saving the rest of the biosphere will be wasted. If in a few decades we would find out that this negative scenario of the continuation of civilization development would come true, unfortunately it will not be possible to go back in time to correct the mistakes made. now we have the opportunity to correct the mistakes made so far in the development of a civilization that develops mainly on the basis of burning fossil fuels. In a few decades it may be too late. It is a waste of time for barren disputes, since so little time has been left to save the climate and the biosphere from much greater degradation compared to what has already been done. There is no point in arguing with models anymore. There is no longer any time to argue about models, assumptions, doctrines, philosophies, etc. determined by subjective conditions, contradicting objective facts and certainties. One of the certainties is that, as I wrote before, the period of the next few decades is the key and critical period as the last period in which humans can still significantly reduce the negative impact of the development of civilization on the biosphere and climate. Until the mid-21st century at the latest, humanity still has a chance to save the biosphere, biodiversity of natural ecosystems and the climate for future generations. Later it may be too late and the time cannot be turned back.
Thank you,
Regards,
Dariusz
1.Conservation of biodiversity through creations of protected areas, parks, zoos,
2.Support for the indigenous communities through awareness, education and livelihoods diversification to limit over exploitation of the environment.
3Fight climate change
4.Government policies inform of rules and laws and monitoring mechanism
5. Provision of funds to support bioversity research
Dear John,
Thanks for your reply. You have pointed out some of the most important elements of protecting the biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems. Protecting the biodiversity of natural ecosystems is important because in doing so we protect the planet's greatest wealth, which has evolved over billions of years. It is essential to develop instruments and systems to protect the biodiversity of natural ecosystems and to increase conservation, because the rate of human-induced loss of the planet's biosphere biodiversity is still very high.
Thank you very much,
Greetings,
Dariusz
Watch Dr. Happer's 37 minute presentation at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5HYbAkVXuU
to gain assurance (based on ROCK SOLID PHYSICS) that there is no climate emergency and that EVEN doubling current atmospheric levels of Carbon Dioxide, Methane and Nitrous Oxide will have miniscule and insignificant effects on the global climate.
Thank you very much, dear professor, may God bless you.
Maintain cleanliness to prevent pollution, use clean energy as much as possible, take care of natural plants and trees and increase them, and reduce overfishing of animals, birds and fish.
I Honestly believe that ecosystems should be prioritized according to the abundance of endangered species, keystone species, and essential resources... Conservation, nature protection and even disease surveillance should work at an ecosystem and ecological level, rather than at an individual or species level.