With Regards to the Sb2Te3 topological crystal what could be the reason for observing activation energies (measured in rage of 200-350 K ) higher than the energy ban gap in spite of the ohmic nature of contact. ?
Thank you for your interest. We contact the sample sides to two Ag contacts at 0.8 cm length and 0.2 width. The sample is inserted into a closed cycle cryogenic cryostat (He) the system is brought at vacuum of 10^-5 mbar. then ohmic test is verified, there after temperature is lowered to 200 K, then I-V test i verified each 5 K. after delay of stability of 60 sec at each step
The topological insulator has a very different behaviour on its surface (a semimetal with gap zero) and on the bulk which is an insulator. What is the activation energy that you find higher than the energy gap?
Thank you. That is quite a lot, that is 0.6 eV for the excess of the gap energy. Where do you take the this gap energy in the surface or in the bulk? Do you distinguish these two different parts of the material?
Thus if you consider that on the surface the band energy gap is zero ( are you doing that?), this means that you have 0.6 eV of activation energy which you could coincide with an effective energy gap thermally induced. Why do you distinguish the energy gap from the activation energy?
Thank u. you are mostly right as I believe. I distinguish between them because I am not sure about the value. If I said this is Eg then I must be sure. but why there is conflect btwn the thermal and optical gap. Thank u