Some ciphers are very common, such as Ceaser, Playfair etc. But when they are combine to produce a ciphertext it looks more complex for cryptanalysis which looks more secure.
The key difference between robust and non-robust encryption lies in the level of resistance to attacks and the ability to maintain data privacy and anonymity. Robust encryption is designed to provide a higher level of security and resistance to attacks or misuse compared to other types. The simple answer is yes, better encryption can be achieved by combining algorithms. For example combining symmetric and asymmetric encryption algorithms in a hybrid approach (e.g., RSA and AES). You can also look into Key Encapsulation Mechanism and adding transforms, etc. Of course, what are the drawbacks? In addition to complexity and performance concerns I'd check if combined encryption schemes are interoperable with systems and platforms.
Deciding whether to combine two cryptographic algorithms or improve an existing one for better security depends on several factors and the specific context. Here's an analysis of both approaches:
Combining two algorithms:
Advantages:
Increased security: Combining algorithms with different strengths can compensate for weaknesses in each other, making it more difficult for attackers to break the overall system.
Flexibility: Combining algorithms allows tailoring security to specific needs. Different algorithms can be used for different purposes, such as encryption, authentication, and key management.
Defense against future attacks: Combining algorithms can make the system more resilient against future attacks that might exploit weaknesses in a single algorithm.
Disadvantages:
Increased complexity: Combining algorithms can significantly increase the complexity of the system, making it harder to design, implement, and maintain.
Reduced performance: Combining algorithms can lead to performance overhead due to additional computational steps, impacting processing speed and efficiency.
Potential vulnerabilities: Combining algorithms introduces new potential vulnerabilities at the interface points between the algorithms.
Improving an existing cipher:
Advantages:
Simplicity: Improving an existing cipher leverages its established security and maintains the system's simplicity. This minimizes the risk of introducing new vulnerabilities.
Performance: Optimizing an existing cipher can often improve its performance without significantly impacting security.
Reduced complexity: Maintaining a single algorithm avoids the complexity involved in combining and managing multiple algorithms.
Disadvantages:
Limited security improvement: Focusing solely on improving a single algorithm might not offer significant security improvements if the algorithm's inherent weaknesses are not addressed.
Potential exhaustion of improvements: Existing algorithms may eventually reach a limit in their security potential, making further improvements impractical.
Susceptibility to future attacks: An improved algorithm might still be vulnerable to future attacks that exploit weaknesses not addressed by the improvements.
Ultimately, the best approach depends on:
Security requirements: The level of security needed for the specific application or data.
Performance requirements: The acceptable level of performance overhead.
Available resources: The technical expertise and resources available for implementation and maintenance.
Threat landscape: The potential threats and vulnerabilities the system faces.
In general, combining algorithms is a powerful approach for achieving high security levels, but it comes with increased complexity and potential drawbacks. Improving an existing cipher is often simpler and more efficient, but it might not offer significant security benefits or future-proofness.
It's important to carefully evaluate the specific context and requirements before choosing between these approaches. Consulting with security experts and analyzing available research and best practices can help make informed decisions for optimal security.