Conceptual research is more suitable for bibliometric analysis as it helps understand and categorize scientific data, identifying core research areas, authors, and their relationships.

The most common method of bibliometric analysis is modeling. It involves analysing the citations in a particular set of publications to determine the impact of the publications and the extent of their influence on subsequent research

Haider Ali , your answer was very helpful. Could you please elaborate on the main differences between research frameworks and conceptual research in the context of bibliometric analysis?

Conceptual research focuses on developing new concepts or refining existing ones; on the other hand, framework research provides a structure for organizing and interpreting research findings.

In bibliometric analysis, the focus is on exploring and analyzing large volumes of scientific data rather than applying a predefined framework. While frameworks can provide a solid foundation for studies, they may limit the exploration of emergent themes and concepts, which is essential in bibliometric analysis.

I hope you understand.

Haider Ali I am greatly grateful for your valuable response.

Regards,

Dear Hachemi Inas

In bibliometric analysis, the choice between using a research framework and a conceptual framework largely depends on the objectives of the study and the nature of the data being analyzed. Here's a general guideline to help decide which might be more suitable for a review paper in economics or social science:

Research Framework: A research framework in bibliometric analysis typically involves a structured, systematic approach to collect, analyze, and present data. This framework is often quantitative, focused on measurable data derived from publications, citations, and other quantifiable metrics. It is especially useful when the goal is to assess trends, patterns, and networks within a large body of literature. This type of framework might include:

• Identifying the volume of publications over time.
• Analyzing citation networks to understand the influence and connectivity among researchers.
• Mapping key topics and their evolution through keyword analysis.

Conceptual Framework: A conceptual framework, on the other hand, is more qualitative and interpretative. It focuses on understanding the theories, themes, and concepts that emerge from bibliometric data. This approach is suitable when the aim is to contextualize the findings within broader theoretical constructs or to explore the implications of empirical data on existing theories. In bibliometric studies, this might involve:

• Interpreting the significance of emerging trends in literature.
• Relating the development of research themes to broader social or economic theories.
• Exploring the impact of scholarly work on policy-making or academic discourse.

Choosing the Suitable Framework:

• Objective Alignment: Consider what you aim to achieve with your bibliometric analysis. If the purpose is to objectively measure and map out the landscape of research, a research framework is more appropriate. If the goal is to understand the implications of data or to build upon theoretical aspects, a conceptual framework would be more fitting.
• Nature of the Subject Area: In fields where theory development is crucial, such as in many social sciences, a conceptual framework can provide deeper insights. In more empirically driven fields like economics, a research framework might provide more actionable information.

For a review paper in economics or social science, it's often valuable to start with a research framework to gather and analyze data systematically. Subsequently, a conceptual framework can be employed to interpret these findings within the context of existing theories and discussions. This dual approach allows for a comprehensive analysis that is both grounded in empirical data and enriched by theoretical insights.

Baharuddin Baharuddin Thank you for sharing such valuable information with me. I truly appreciate your help and insights. Your knowledge has been immensely valuable to me. Thank you once again!

In bibliometric analysis, the choice between framework research and conceptual research methodology depends on the specific objectives and scope of the study. Here’s a comparison to help you understand which might be more suitable:

Suitability Depending on Objectives:

• Framework Research is more suitable when the study aims to:Systematically analyze and quantify bibliometric data. Identify trends, patterns, and relationships in scientific publications. Evaluate the impact of research outputs and collaborations using empirical data. Provide evidence-based insights into the evolution of research fields or disciplines.
• Conceptual Research is more suitable when the study aims to:Explore theoretical frameworks or models applicable to bibliometric analysis. Critically assess existing bibliometric methodologies or propose new approaches. Discuss the philosophical or ethical dimensions of bibliometric practices. Stimulate debate and contribute to theoretical advancements in the field of bibliometrics.

Conclusion:

Both framework research and conceptual research methodologies have their merits in bibliometric analysis. The choice depends on whether the focus is on empirical data analysis, trends, and metrics (framework research) or on theoretical exploration, methodological innovation, and conceptual frameworks (conceptual research). Often, a combination of both approaches can provide a comprehensive understanding of bibliometric phenomena and contribute to advancements in the field.

Chuck A Arize

Baharuddin Baharuddin

Haider Ali

Osagie Leslie Uwabor

I wanted to reach out and express my sincere gratitude for the comments received that were incredibly useful in improving the quality of my work. Your contribution has been invaluable in helping me improve my arguments and address auditors' concerns.