I report abuse and discrimination.

Dear Peter Breuer ,

Thank you for your reply.

The question is not if they have the right to reject a paper but if it is right arxiv to selectively ban authors of submitting any preprints and allowing only postprints?

In my opinion, this constitutes discrimination (essentially blacklisting) and an abuse of power that infringes upon the rights of authors. It is concerning that arXiv dictates that authors cannot submit their non-peer-reviewed work while positioning itself as a platform for preprints.

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil Markoulakis

arxiv user

p.s. The paper was this one,

Preprint Experiment for the detection of superluminal propagating dar...

funny enough just a few weeks previously, arxiv had accepted and announced an other paper of ours which however I was not the submitting author this time. So clearly this suggests active blacklisting by arxiv. See here, https://tinyurl.com/4m6p9t3h .

Are you defending arxiv or what now?

No the ban is personal, general and permanent and not on a specific paper.

I am not allowed to submit preprints anymore in arxiv and will be automatically rejected without concerning the content of the papers.

And is not about me but I am sure that they are many other authors that have been treated improper by this platform and received the same or similar ban.

If don't think this kind of of scientific contact demonstrated by Arxiv towards authors is professional and justifiable.

You cannot being a preprint platform demand from people NOT to post preprints in general and FOREVER and accept only postpints after they have been published by a conventional Journal !! THIS IS STUPID and defies the very purpose of being a preprints platform.

It would be more honest and acceptable if they had just told me not to submit papers anymore, which i will do from now on anyway.

Heretic ;-) I think they now would reject even Einstein. Welcome in the Club!

Dear @Peter Breuer

Yes viXra has been estalished in order to allow placing preprints to authors having prblems to publish at arXiv. It is still available but they have now stricter rules than at the beginning. You can now only upload three replacements and the filesize shall not exceed 5 MB otherwise the file is rejected without information. And there is no Diskussion. There is a forum to do discussions related to viXra but the forum is nearly dead. Now RG abolished comments it evolves into viXra.V2.

You don't need to go from the one extreme to other. There is middle ground like RG, SSRN, HAL.

Needless to say, that I am not new in Arxiv.

https://tinyurl.com/bdd5duzm

I have 7 papers published in Arxiv over the last years but lately the persons or algorithms or AIs that are moderating and runing this place have become IMO, real Sticks!

They now reject papers even previously puplished (postprints) by Scopus-indexed Journals.

They do not only reject formal requests but also disregard GDPR regulations and fundamental rights concerning personal data.

My initial request received no response. Following up, I explicitly warned them:

"Please note that it has now been 31 days since my initial request, meaning you are in violation of Article 17 of the GDPR. This email serves as a formal reminder that you must fully comply with my request. Should you fail to do so, I reserve the right to escalate the matter to the Data Protection Agency."

Only then did they respond—but merely with excuses as to why they cannot cease the sale of my personal data.

Let‘s see what they are going to do when I escalate it to the Data Protection Agency after the 30 days time they have…