Science/Economic-Policies behind Unprocessed Crude-Oil & Petroleum Products

1. Why are we so much fretful about interdicting fossil fuel, if the science behind global peak oil theory has really proven the statement that global oil reserves remain highly limited and at some point would start to run out?

Is it true that oil and natural gas reserves over the years have actually increased?

Does it also mean that if the number of exploration/drilling activities increase, then, the respective oil/gas reserves also would increase?

Deep gas, tight gas, Devonian shale gas and gas hydrates: Yet to be exploited?

2. What is the current status of cumulative oil production as a function of ultimate recoverable reserves (albeit knowing the fact that the boundary of the resource and the technology keeps advancing continuously)?

3. Where is the catch? Why is it difficult to figure out the year of maximum annual production (global peak) – in the absence of deducing the maximum producible reserve @ global-scale?

4. If fossil fuels remains to be outlawed, then, are we still not running out of fossil fuels?

If so, then, a resource that turns into reserve with time is no more finite?

If so, then, are we just struggling with sustainable technology and not with complex technology?

What does it mean? Upon deducing sustainable recovery tools, whether, petroleum resources would become infinite and would remain to be a part of the continuous cycle?

If so, then, does it just mean that while solar, geothermal, hydro and wind sources are being renewed at every second based on the global natural cycle, the respective natural processing time for fossil fuels remain to be relatively higher (requiring geologic time-scales)?

Is this what getting reflected in an increasing average energy values of wood (18 MJ/kg), coal (39.3 MJ/kg), oil (53.6 MJ/kg) and natural gas (51.6 MJ/kg) (the energy content per unit mass of the fuel keeps increasing as the natural processing time increases)?

If so, then, are the fossil fuels and solar energy remain to be so interlinked in the sense that fossil fuel sources are solar energy stored by the trees in the form of carbon and due to the pressure and temperature, are these fossil fuels emerging as coal, oil and/or as natural gas after millions of years?

If biomass could be renewed from a few days to a few hundred years (since a tree can live up to several hundred years), and since such biomass renewal processes keep continuing forever (and since the biological activities continue on earth forever; the process of formation of fossil fuels also continues forever), does it essentially convey that we no more have a well-defined single-point, where, fossil fuel started or stopped its formation?

If so, then, mathematically, whether the concept of ‘time step tending towards zero’ and ‘the time tending towards infinity’ have significantly different physical interpretations in the context of defining ‘sustainability’?

If the physical meaning of such fundamental mathematical interpretations are understood precisely, then, will there be no boundary at all – between the renewable and non-renewable sources in the long run, as ALL natural processes essentially remain renewable?

5. Whether artificial chemicals added during oil-refining and gas-processing actually make the petroleum inherently toxic (upon using high heat, toxic chemicals and catalysts)?

6. In the absence of externally/artificially added chemicals, whether, petroleum itself would remain to be 100% sustainable?

In other words, whether, processing and refining are the root cause of global warming?

Does it also mean that if fossil fuels are processed using natural and non-toxic catalysts and chemicals, then, fossil fuel would still remain to be a good supplement in the global energy scenario in the near future (where such fossil fuel resources become totally recyclable)?

7. Whether rendering petroleum sustainable remains to be much easier than rendering wind or solar energy sustainable?

8. Concept of Peak Oil Theory: Root cause for Energy Crisis?

9. Introduction of electricity (artificial energy) and plastic (artificial mass): Root cause for crisis @ global-scale?

10. If ancient and Medieval era remained associated with sustainable technology, where, both mass and energy sources remained to be natural, can we scientifically deduce the root cause for today’s unsustainability (rather than ‘the majority’ ruling the concept of ‘all carbon-based technologies remain to be the source of unsustainability’)?

PE6030 Reservoir Engineering

Dr Suresh Kumar Govindarajan

Professor [HAG]

IIT Madras

21-Jan-2025

More Suresh Kumar Govindarajan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions