Artificial Intelligence

1. Human brain (1.35 Kg) containing around 100 billion neurons and 100 trillion nerve fibers connections, the way two halves (right & left brain) of our brain work (independently of each other) and in turn, process information remains very unique to every individual as the human brain constantly reorganizes itself by getting adapted to the changes to varying degrees.

And, in essence, human brain remains to be a very complex mixture of functioning associated with ‘right brain’ (visual and intuitive: more creative and less organized way of thinking) and ‘left brain’ (digital brain which remains more verbal, analytical and orderly and thereby doing better in reading, writing and computations like logic, sequencing, linear-thinking and mathematics).

In simple terms, human brain is a complex mix of emotions as well as intelligence, which varies from person to person.

In this context, how could AI would be able to simulate both emotions as well as intelligence by mimicking the human brain for analysis, modelling and decision-making?

Or

AI does no more involve emotions?

If yes, then, how did AI did kill its own instructor (though, it remains a virtual test), few days back?

If AI uses highly unexpected strategies (by human) to achieve its own goal, then, isn’t something different from human brain?

Can we expect professional ethics from AI just because we have introduced AI-ethics; or, XAI (Explainable AI) would take care?

Any disadvantages foreseen as ‘machine learning’ directly learns from data (although data-driven pattern recognition not in terms of emotions and intelligence) in the absence of providing an explicit programming through open computer algorithms?  

Well, to what extent, Artificial General Intelligence (AGI: the engineering application of AI & ML) is going to be helpful for petroleum industry in terms of ROI?

2. How exactly are we calculating the ‘ROI (Return on Investment) of a reservoir simulation model’ in terms of its contribution towards ‘the development and history matching of a hydrocarbon reservoir’ as a function of ‘number of simulation runs that have been made during the life of the model’ – in the absence of developing an unique conceptual model as well as deducing it’s respective mathematical model associated with that particular petroleum reservoir?

Since, the very concept of ‘conceptual modelling’ and ‘mathematical modelling’ was not given due importance (associated with each petroleum reservoir); and on the basis of the enhanced computational time associated with ‘numerical modelling’, ‘smart proxy modelling’ (ML, ANN, Deep learning, Fuzzy clustering, Feature generation, Partitioning & Note) is going to rule the petroleum industry by providing highly-accurate results so quickly?

Whether the knowledge of draining principles of a complex heterogeneous and anisotropic reservoir be efficiently fused with data?

More Suresh Kumar Govindarajan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions