If I put water on e.g. unoxidised or oxidised chromium plane how those water molecules next to the plane will be arranged?
It may serve as a stepping stone for the production of an antimatter bomb which is based on the principle that when antimatter comes into contact with matter, it annihilates- the mass of the particle and its antiparticle are converted into pure energy.This large-scale annihilation of antimatter and matter could theoretically be used either in a destructive or constructive way .
Chromium metal is antiferromagnetic at room temperatures as well as at lower temperatures with the free electrons are located on top of each crystal. Tap water contains 25 percent of para-water where protons have opposite spins When these water molecules are put on Cr at low temperatures , they will arrange themselves according the underlying electron spin pattern. So ,now we have proton pairs with different spin orientations ,i.e they are aligned spin axes head-on. Given proper conditions, it can result in proton annihilation,i.e the mass of the proton and its antiparticle are converted into energy.
Of course, there is no way that antimatter could be created in sufficient quantities to be used in a bomb. Nor could it be transported, as the antimatter traps capable of containing any significant quantity of antimatter would have to be enormous, and would require huge amounts of energy to operate. But an idea of antimatter bomb may be floated.
@Manohar What would you say if I claim that particle is its antiparticle? It all depends on spin vector directions between two (same type of) particles when they are put together spin axis poles head-on.
Chromium might provide needed platform for enabling easier proton annihilation generation.
I humbly submit that I have already mentioned this point in my answer as follows:
[they will arrange themselves according the UNDERLYING ELECTRON SPIN PATTERN ]
Implying therby that is presence of a specific arrangement of electons of antiferromagneic chromium that brings about change in proton spins and thus the annihilation.
@Manohar So you did, sorry about that! (my brains must have been in sleep or something). Using chromium might be more suitable for constructive purposes. Using solid hydrogen monolayers is another story.
Honestly, I have not understood your comments though I have reproduced what I have already mentioned (rightly or wrongly).Any way, it is an academic discussion and we should better leave it for our other worthy RG colleagues if I did not come up to your expections.
@Manohar Let me help you. What part you didn't understand? To me, it seems that you have understood me quite well. Have you read my updated Antimatter paper? http://toebi.com/documents/Antimatter.pdf
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Quantum Physics
- Quantum Mechanics