Dear Kimmo

I am highly interested to make a collaboration with you. Please tell me you plan and some suggestions for me. Please write me some details on mail ID [email protected]

Dear Kimmo

I am highly interested to make a collaboration with you. Please tell me you plan and some suggestions for me. Please write me some details on mail ID [email protected]

Kimmo, is there any practical purpose or unstated agenda to your research ? Without going into any scientific considerations of feasibility or merit , it sounds at first blush like the kind of research that military labs would be interested in?

@Mohammad I'm glad that you are interested in! I'll give more details within couple of days.

@Chris I'm looking for a collaboration in order to create POC (Proof of Concept) for my antimatter idea. Theoretical basis for the idea is described in Antimatter and ToEbi papers, so naturally positive outcome verifies the underlying theory.

Based on IP addresses which have downloaded my Antimatter (and other) paper, at least Fermilab and few other labs worldwide have some sort of interest towards it. I don't know if they have any plans to go further with it and even if they did, those kinds of experiments get classified.

But I want to know if my idea works! I would have been completely happy if one of those labs would have informed me (in honest fashion) that the idea works or doesn't work. I want to get involved, one way or the other.

One more thing Chris, if you get familiar with my idea you will pretty soon realize that it has very promising features and great potential. There is few minor errors in ToEbi paper of course, but in general, it's pretty convincing. Are you at least a bit interested in the outcome?

Dear Kimmo,

It seems very confusing, to say the least. Antimatter is not simply "matter with opposite spin". Antimatter moves backwards in time has positive energy and thus falls in gravitational field like matter. The paired electrons with opposite spin in a covalent bond are not matter-antimatter (electron-positron ) pairs.

Of course, you may go ahead with your proposed study, without calling it antimatter, which has a very well-defined meaning in physics.

See Faeynman-Stuckelberg interpretation for antimatter. Another approach is that of the Dirac sea of negative energy anti-particles, which move forward in time like particles.

You may say "study of anti-parallely or oppositely spinning matter" rather than antimatter research for avoiding confusion.

Regards,

Rajat

@Rajat I'm totally aware of the concept antimatter in contemporary particle physics. But surprisingly, every particle *is* its antiparticle, in *certain* situation, and that situation is when we put those two particles together in a way I have described. Believe it or not! Based on ToEbi that's exactly what happens in above situation.

I don't want to participate in a lengthy discussion, but I want you to think about one simple example. Let us consider an electron. It's charge is -1. The antiparticle to an electron is a positron. It's charge is +1. There is no scenario in which electron could be transformed to positron by any manipulations with spin, because it would violate electrical charge conservation.

In fact what you are trying to talk about is not just P inversion which changes particle spin, but a CP inversion which also changes particle charge. In case of Majorana true neutral particles it is indeed possible to change particle into antiparticle by simply changing its spin and it is possible to construct a model with virtual annihilation of two such particles (please see neutrinoless double beta-decay for example).

@Alexander Charge is a superfluous concept, read this paper http://toebi.com/documents/book.pdf So I wouldn't be too concerned about exchanging "charges".

http://toebi.com/documents/book.pdf

Dear Kimmo,

Do you mean that a spin-flip automatically changes the charge also, making it the corresponding anti-particle ?

This goes against well-established facts since the discovery of spin.

Regards

Rajat

@Rajat I know this is kind of mind bender, but please, read that book.pdf. Spin-flipping doesn't change much of the behaviour between proton and electron (only that hyperfine structure much), so we can say that spin-flipping per se doesn't exchange "charges".

Yes

I will like to join. Update me with the details. Thanks

@Asmaa @Mukhtar

Great! Let me think for a day or two the form of our possible future collaboration. I would like to give a shot for Project feature here at ResearchGate...

@Mohammad, @Asmaa, @Mukhtar Do you have suggestions? You can contact me also directly via email ([email protected])

@Asmaa Do you mean Skype conference call or what?

Update: Did you mean a discussion in Project feature?

Sure I am interested but what I like most is the idea of making collaboration in a simple and nice way, I hope it can be a good example that many other researcher can fellow.

Friday night I have an event to attend to. But we have to find a way out to collaborate, discuss on the topic. Our objectives, aims or target.

Ok, how about this one... next Monday (03/10) 15:00 Helsinki, Finland local time we have our first meeting. For some reason, I'm not able to add Mukhtar and Mohamed into my Antimatter project here at ResearchGate. If I can't do that by Sunday, let's have a conference call/chat over Skype. You should send your Skype contact invitation to me ahead of that meeting. My Skype name is kimmo.rouvari

Have a nice weekend!

I am interested in these things; relating to negative energy/mass Eigen-states I am presuming? I was working with foundations of quantum theory when i was doing my PhD and my supervisor explained something to me. He explained that all measured mass is outgoing into the past. I agreed. Then he spoke to me about all that is incoming from the future. Then he showed me that even in a forced system the total energy may be conserved if the incoming-from-the-future half of mechanics is also considered. He then showed me his derivation of the Dirac equation, ultimately from one simple principle. The incoming future generates the outgoing past.

I put the latest version from my future book available. You should read it through (or at least parts related to particle decay and antimatter) as a prerequisite to tomorrow's meeting.

I couldn't add Mukhtar and Mohamed into my Antimatter project here at ResearchGate, so all participants please, send your Skype contact invitations to me (kimmo.rouvari).

Dear Kimmo Rouvari

Sound like a very interesting project and maybe further can be used for an extended explanation of the nature of Energy.

Who standing behind the project ?

@Kurt Nobody at the moment, financially, but process is ongoing in order to get needed equipment and facilities. I'm currently working exclusively with Dr. Mohammad Ayaz Ahmad.

I worke very hard on 2 projects for the moment and cant involve me further in new projects.

Why dont You contact peopel working with the LHC accelerator in Cern.

Wish You luck with the project.

@Kurt Thanks! I might have contacted (something like a year ago) one or two CERN people, but the problem is that theory behind my prediction regarding antimatter is just too unbelievable, even though it's right. Therefore, nothing has happened... so far.

Kimmo, antimatter is present in every atom in the form of positrons moving in balanced orbits with electrons. Pls see my paper on this at ResearchGate:

"New Concepts for the Reversal of Gravity and Time and Some Practical Derivations"

Dear Kimmo Rouvari

Please tell me all information in about the equipment and also tell me the cost otherwise tell me the name and model number only. I will check it myself.

Dear Mohammad,

I'll do that in couple of days.

@Peter I'll check it.

@Peter We have very similar ideas about the role of electron and time. If you haven't read my papers, I strongly suggest that you do so. But I do disagree with your view on positrons.

Please send me a link to your papers.

@Peter You can find them here at ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kimmo_Rouvari/publications/ and from my blog http://www.toebi.com/blog/

Thank you, Kimmo. We certainly have a difference of opinion on the subject. In my view, antimatter annihilation is a fiction that won't ever be used for anything "useful". Matter is based on electrons and positrons and all unstable particles are various fragments of the proton, itself is a compound of electrons and positrons. I appreciate sharing your views with me.

Me! Regards

@Luisa Thank you for your interest. At the moment I'm collaborating with prof. Mohammad Ahmad. However, I don't see any problem if you (or anybody else) want to have their own research and experiments on the matter. Naturally, I'm willing to consult you or your research team so that you have all the necessary information in order to succeed.

Also, there will be numerous future researches on the matter, so there will be great discoveries for everybody.

Dear Kimmo

I read you book chapters very care fully and it is very much interesting.

I think that Now, we have to plan our strategic aims such as:

1- In how much times will be complete this project

2- and what will be responsibilities or work for such and such collaborators

And some other issues.

Dear Mohammad

I agree with you. Did you get that research proposal paper I sent to you? Doable?

I would like to participate in this antimatter research ( and spin particles studies), but i don´t know how to. This teme is very interesting and very important for our planet and people. The attached paper by Dr Kimmo is very interesting.

@Éder Thank you very much! (BTW, I'm not Dr) I'll send you a message today.

I am interested in participating in such research. Very nice idea!

@Sharif Thank you and welcome on board! I'll contact you today also.

hello everyone,

Rouvari, Muhammad am sorry for the long silence. I was caught-up in a work, but am almost through with it. Now, I am ready to participate fully in the proposed work. I am Looking forward to hearing for you guys. Thanks.

@Mukhtar Good to hear from you again! I'll send you a message today.

I think everybody should read these blog posts http://www.toebi.com/blog/category/antimatter-bomb/

There I have described our next phase antimatter experiments.

@Mukhtar, @Éder, @Sharif Did you guys get my message here at ResearchGate?

hi kimmo, sorry by to write so later.

How can I help you?

@J. Muñoz

I sent you private message!

Hi Kimmo, I will like collaborate in your research, please send me specific literatures of the topic you are planning to work and the method that your team will be use.

@Luis I'll send you the needed information tomorrow morning (in Finnish time).

Hi you all,

It all started very promising... but eventually nothing materialized. Maybe I should make a new request or question if you will in future, maybe with very highly detailed description of proposed experiment.

I bet that some of you guys have an access to spin adjustable electron guns or to spin adjustable proton beam(s). Potential reward will be awesome for the experimenter.

Take a look at my latest paper (attached). It kind of shows the way for the future antimatter experiment. 

I think matter and antimatter exist in balance inside every atom. We should be able to achieve separation for study and use...

@Peter Read that linked paper (Antimatter Bomb) and tell me what prevents e.g. proton from being Majorana particle?

A proton is not an authentic elementary particle but is composed of electron-positron (e-p) pairs compressed to a high degree. A proton is surrounded by cubical pressure walls that hold its composition together. When a proton is bombarded, unstable e-p compounds are released. Antimatter exists at the level of the positron. Annihilation is an illusionary phenomenon. Although energy is released, particles do not cancel out; they merely change their time domains.

@Peter It's kind of amusing how close our views on e.g. proton structure are, don't you think?

I did not have the chance to read your paper on these concepts. You know, when the idea of devising a better bomb comes up that cools down my enthusiasm...

@Peter Question... Without antimatter bomb, how in Earth you are going to wipe out an incoming (potentially end-of-the-world type of) asteroid? Conventional nukes won't do the trick. That kind of situation can emerge out of the blue.

My feeling is that a "super-bomb" would be used on people down here. There is plenty of crazyness and destruction going on nowadays so there is no need for a "better" bomb. People should fix up their acts first and then asteroids will be no problem... i

@Peter I do agree with you, but I still think that it's good thing to put effort on asteroid prevention too.

We need a new type of propulsion technology to transport a device that will enable us pull asteroids out of their trajectories at ease.

@Peter In case of surprise (few weeks heads up) asteroids that ain't gonna work.