The amount of ozone being formed and destroyed by UV are massive numbers which humans cannot possibly match by any known chemical we could add. The solution to the ozone hole is to end the emission of CFC and limit other ozone destroying chemicals. We are so fortunate that this is happening now following international agreements (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Protocol ) and the ozone layer is slowly recovering. Thus the solution in place is not to add anything, but to cease addition of CFCs. This successful agreement is a model for the solution to our next environmental challenge consisting of greenhouse gasses.

Kenneths nonsense mentioned in the posting before this is not supported by any scientists and should be interpreted as religious denialism. You can read about the common scientific understanding of the ozone layer and ozone depletion in this excellent Wikipedia article which you will notice doesn't mention any Kenneth's fact resistant denial nonsense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion

All lies. Just read the references in the Wikipedia file to find the data. Unfortunately denial blindness prevent you from understanding the data.

Perhaps you should explain why your lies are not published anywhere. There isn't even mentioned any doubt in the Wikipedia article.

Dear Kenneth and Henrik,

For proper understanding of climate change and also severe weather; we need to establish whether there is a strong relationship between stratospheric ozone changes and also to extend to explaining changes in the Earth’s climate system for the purpose of environmental protection; to make humans, animal, and plant safe on the planet.

Please find my observational evidence of fluctuation in stratospheric ozone in the tropics (Figure 1 and Table 1). I published the results in Ozone: Science & Engineering 2011 (Taylor and Francis).

I also attached additional evidence from tropics over Brazilian region (full paper by Sahai et al. 2000, originally published in Journal of Geophysical Research)

Dear Kenneth,

Awesome! I am grateful for your supportive data to convince us beyond reasonable doubt that there is "NO NET LOSS" in global stratospheric ozone. So stratospheric ozone has been "swinging" around the average global value!

I attached my full paper with this answer. Other results are yet to be published. In the forthcoming results, I have looked at the influence of solar and geophysical parameters on ground- and spaced-based stratospheric ozone.

Once again, thank you for sharing this information with the researchers at the ResearchGate community.

Regards

Dear Kenneth,

Thanks for extra experimental observations.

Why is latitudinal behavior of seasonal global ozone inverted at the middle latitudes? This sharply contrast seasonal variation at the equatorial and tropical stations (the earlier tropical results I posted in ResearchGate). In any case, just as in ionized atmosphere, the behavior changes as move further away from equatorial region.

Regards

Great! Kenneth