Shirin, I prefer to think about validity as a process rather than as a 'thing'. Validation is a process by we we judge how good a measure is a measuring what it purports to measure. This involves many different approaches to validation, such as experts agreeing that the questions are appropriate (face validity), the questions hang together in a meaningful way (construct validity), that the scores correlate with measures of similar variables (convergent validity) etc etc. So the process of validation does not have an end point when some statistical estimate is calculated, it's just part of the process of accumulating evidence.
Shirin, I prefer to think about validity as a process rather than as a 'thing'. Validation is a process by we we judge how good a measure is a measuring what it purports to measure. This involves many different approaches to validation, such as experts agreeing that the questions are appropriate (face validity), the questions hang together in a meaningful way (construct validity), that the scores correlate with measures of similar variables (convergent validity) etc etc. So the process of validation does not have an end point when some statistical estimate is calculated, it's just part of the process of accumulating evidence.