" It is rare to use an LCR meter to characterize the electromagnetic shielding performance of materials. Please give details of the test process and explain the basis for choosing this test method. Please re-draw Figures 4-8 and provide more data points in the figures to obtain smooth curves".
The reviewer third time send me this and I already explained how I characterize my material and how to get data but he/she still sending me the same review. can anyone help me with his/her experience?
Dear Muhammad,
thanks for sharing this interesting technical problem with the RG community and sorry to see that your question has not yet received any helpful answers. In general, it is very important to address the comments made by the reviwers point by point and send the list of revisions which have been made directly to the editor of the journal. Did you consider the point "Please re-draw Figures 4-8 and provide more data points in the figures to obtain smooth curves"? Perhaps you should use a different software to generate the Figures. Then rephrase your response letter and send it again to the Editor together with the revised manuscript. It is also helpful to mark all changes, additions and corrections in yellow so that the editor can immediately see what has been changed.
Good luck with your work!
Frank T. Edelmann Thanks a lot for your valuable suggestion. I have done it as well and the reviewer send it again three times. then I add some more characterizations then he accepted the paper and it was online on 27 Sep. 2021.
Dear Muhammad,
congratulations on having your valuable manuscript finally published! It always pays off to address all comments made by the reviewers point by point.
Good luck with your future work!
Dear Muhammad.
many thanks for your kind response and sorry to hear that your name was not listed as co-author in this manuscript. If it is your work that was described, you should have been listed among the co-authors. We did 40+ years of successful research in inorganic chemistry. During all those years I always handled authorship in the way that everyone became a co-author who made a significant scientific contribution to the work reported. I think that's only fair for everyone.
With best wishes, Frank Edelmann
Dear Frank T. Edelmann Thanks a lot for your Comments. Yes, that was my work but you can not do anything while your supervisor leading. so it is better to bear and wait for your time and show the world you can do anything, even you are facing hurdles and different problems.
- Badges
- Science topic