One of the reviewers of my recently submitted paper seems to have written the review using ChatGPT.
I am, of course, willing to revise the paper if the content of the review is appropriate.
However, none of the 9 revision requests in this review are related to my paper.
In this case, how should I respond? Should I write a letter to the editor?
In my opinion, you need to let the reviewer know that you know what you wrote about.
Write to the editor. Express your concern to the editor of the journal
If you believe that the review you received is not relevant to your paper and may have been generated by ChatGPT or lacks substance, it is appropriate to address this with the editor as Peterson K. Ozili proposed.
______________
Briefly explain the context of your letter, mentioning that you appreciate the review process but have concerns about the relevance of the review received. List the specific revision requests and explain why they don't pertain to your paper. Provide evidence or examples to support your claims. Politely ask the editor whether it would be possible to consider another review or a different reviewer who may be better suited to evaluate your work. If possible, indicate your Byunghyun Ban willingness to revise your paper based on legitimate feedback and your readiness to address any constructive criticism.
- Badges
- Science topic