I have derived an equation containing Hubble's constant 'H' , Einstein's gravitational constant'k' and Siva's constant 'K'. With this I predicted a particle which is basic building block of mass.I have calculated its mass as 10-25 Kgs. I understood that it is force particle of a new fundamental force with a coupling constant 10-8 just near to weak interaction(of standard model).
As per its mass it seems like a rediscovery of 'Higgs Boson'.
But it has a diameter of 10-25mt. different from that of prediction of Higgs mechanism.
This particle is predicted by different methodology than that of standard model and quantum mechanics. It is more of general relativity and methodology is different.
My expertise is not enough to calculate its spin. But as per my knowledge any particle physics expert can calculate its spin by its mass/energy/momentum.
Now I was fed up with the peer review processes of journals and not interested to submit the paper to journals.
Is there any other way to report it to LHC or Fermi labs or CERN?
Dear Siva, I can sort of understand that you dont like the peer review process but it really necessary and helpful and usually finds bug , mistakes or wrong assumption in such kind of derivation. There exist several journals which do a fast publication without a review process you can find them on the web. In the (unlikely)[sorry] event that you have really found a "golden nugget" it will find its way through the community..otherwise someone may tell you what went wrong in your derivation
My Dear Siva
the review is very important for any researcher to know the work is ok or not.
you can find many journals to publish your work . Also, you can send it to CEREN directly
good luck
Thank You Dr.Alagealy.
I am also thinking to send it to CERN for comments.
I used to send my all papers to renowned journals. But reviewers never recommended my work. Then I published my works in SCIRP journals.
traditional journals will not give any fruitful comments. Most importantly "they will say(after consideration for four months)" It is not suitable to our journal you can send it to other journal.It is waste of time.Some journals(both springer and Elsevier) will say your English is not good( comedy is the paper is full of mathematical calculations.very less English writing. I don't know why they have taken five months to say that). The paper has been published in SCIRP( I am attaching that paper for example. It was well commented by the editor Prof.Christian Corda and published in Journal of high energy physics,gravitation and cosmology-JHEPGC).
Kodukula, S.P.(2021) Dark Energy Is a Phenomenal Effect of the Expanding Universe-Possibility for Experimental Verification. Journal of High Energy Physics , Gravitation and Cosmology, 7, 1333-1352.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2021.74083
Few more papers also example for bad peer review reactions.
Kodukula, S.P.(2021) Mechanism of Quantum Consciousness that Synchronizes Quantum Mechanics with Relativity—Perspective of a New Model of Consciousness. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 1633-1655.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.1212097
Two equations of these papers utilized to derive this equation and prediction of the particle.(All my papers are available in my RG profile)
That is the main reason for loosing interest in publication in journals.
Once again thank you. I will try my best to convey my ideas to the righteous people.
Regards,
Siva