Hi all,

I have some difficulties regarding interpretation of categorical variables when some of categories , not all categories are statistically significant in Binary logit model. To explain my question more clearly see the following categorical variable used in my study:

Outcome variable: Enrollment in CBHI scheme( enrolled=1, non-enrolled=0)

Some of categorical variables that I have used are as follows:

1. Age of household head(4 categories)

18-30(reference)

31-40 (odds ratio =0.3512 ; P =0.033**) ** shows signficant at 5%

41-50 (odds ratio= 0.7847; P= 0.604)

above 50 (odds ratio=0.4838; P=0.099)

2. Educational status of household head(5 categories)

illiterate( reference)

read and write( odds ratio=28.68; P=0.000***) *** shows significant at 1%

primary (odds ratio= 3.194408 ; P= 0.040**)

secondary (odds ratio= 5.164823 ; P=0.007***)

tertiary(odds ratio= 1.312708; P=0.677)

In addition to this , which way of interpretation is best( is it interpretating Odds ratio or Marginal effect?) in Logistic regression.

Any answer is appreciated

Regards!

More Takele Ayele's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions