1-12

2-10

5-7

10-6

8-4

3-3

7-3

4-2

6-2

9-1

Sort descending by citation count as I did. N is the first row number where row number is greater then its citation count. H-index is N-1 then.

Worth mention, however, that H-index is being calculated more often for individuals.

Thank you Anna Małgorzata Kamińska for your guidance.

Dr. D.B. Jani

Dear Dr. D.B. Jani

Here is a usefull links :http://www.dit.ie/library/ditlibrarycentralservices/researchsmarts/understandbibliometrics/https://www.library.auckland.ac.nz/subject-guides/med/pdfs/H-index%20and%20impact%20factors.pdf

• H-index and impact factors.pdf
• https://guides.library.unisa.edu.au/c.php?g=169983&p=1119055

h index is a simple and standard method described by Jorge Hirsch: http://www.pnas.org/content/102/46/16569So, Scopus determines  h the same way any other source does:  take the collection  of papers of interest (it does NOT have to be an individual author's papers - any collection of papers has an h index).  Rank them in descending  order by the count of citations.  Find the highest numerical rank where the citation count exceeds the rank.  That's h .The intricacy of h-index, however, is that its precise value depends on several non-quality factors, including:   1.  the  dataset you are using (WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar all  feature h-index) which will affect both the  source items you can include and the citing item population that will be considered If you are comparing h-indexes, it is best to compare within a single resource.  2.  the subject matter of the work - as with any non-normalized citation metric, the expected high/low value will be dependent on subject area.  Medicine,  biomedicine, physics, chemistry - all pretty high;  engineering, agriculture, linguistics...lower;  history, art, literary criticism - comparatively low.  It is best to compare within similar subjects.  There are some adaptations/enhancements to h that attempt to account for some aspects of this by including normalizations based on citation levels  in the h-core.    3.  Age of the corpus - Older things more likely to be cited- and more likely to have achieved near-final citation records.  h-index can  only increase  over time, even if the body of work being considered does not add new items.  Again- see some of the h index adaptations.  4.  the effect of highly cited papers - There are two edge-cases that would give you an h-index of 10:  10 papers with exactly 10 citations each - and nothing  else.  (Total citation count for the body of work:  100);  or 10 papers with 1000 citations each - and nothing else (Total citation count for the body of work: 10,000).  Are these really equivalent academic records?  And, you guessed it, there are a pack  of h index adjustments that address this kind of thing too.  http://www.pnas.org/content/102/46/16569.The index is based on a list of publications ranked in descending order by the number of citations these publications received. The value of h is equal to the number of papers (N) in the list that have N or more citations.

If N is the first row number where row number is greater then its citation count, then H-index is N-1 .

With best Wishes

Thank you A. M. Abdallah sir for your help and support.

Dr D.B. jani