Question: Dear researchers, I am currently working on Fe, Mn, Ni, and Fe/Mn co-doping in Co₃O₄ for the investigation of magnetic and optical properties using Materials Studio (CASTEP DFT calculations). I am applying doping concentrations of 1%, 3%, 5%, and 7%, and would like guidance on the following key points:

  • Supercell Construction: How can I create an accurate supercell to match the desired doping percentages (especially for low concentrations like 1%)? What is the best approach to maintain a balance between computational cost and doping accuracy?
  • Site-Specific Doping (Octahedral vs. Tetrahedral): Since Co₃O₄ has both tetrahedral (Co²⁺) and octahedral (Co³⁺) sites, how can I confirm whether a dopant prefers one site over the other? What calculations should I perform (e.g., total energy, formation energy, Bader charge) to support this conclusion?
  • Experimental and Theoretical Confirmation: Which experimental techniques (e.g., XPS, XANES, EXAFS) are most suitable to validate the DFT predictions regarding dopant site and oxidation state? Can Shannon ionic radii or coordination analysis help as predictive tools for dopant site preference?
  • I would greatly appreciate any detailed suggestions, especially from those who have worked on spinel structures or similar doping studies.

    Thank you in advance for your support and guidance.

    More Numan Abbas's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions