Hi Academic community!
What are, according to you, the best sources on meta-analytic path models and full MA structural equation models? I am looking for both founding fathers of this methodology and most recent advances.
Thanks a lot,
Amélie
Hi Amelie,
beyond the recommendation by Heiko, here are some further references. The Cheung papers are clearly hard to swallow but have some criticisms on the traditional forms. I found the Wilson et al. approach very practical (and do my own MASEMS since than this way). Further, Suzanne Jak has published a book on MASEM. Perhaps worth a look (I hadn't time yet).
At the end of may, the institute in which I work (Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information) organizes a conference on meta-analysis in Dubrovnik. Mike Cheung and Suzanne will also be there. Perhaps you join us.
https://conferences.leibniz-psychology.org/index.php/ressyn/index/schedConfs/archive
HTH
Holger
Cheung, M. W. L. (2002). Meta-analysis for structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Chinese University, Hong Kong.
Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition-performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1035-1070. doi:10.1037/a0028324
Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2018). Accounting for missing correlation coefficients in fixed-effects MASEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(1), 1-14.
Wilson, S. J., Polanin, J. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2016). Fitting meta-analytic structural equation models with complex datasets. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 121-139. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1199
Sheng, Z., Kong, W., Cortina, J. M., & Hou, S. (2016). Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: Current practices and recommendations. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 187-208. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1206
I found this article helpful:
Article Successfully Combining Meta-analysis and Structural Equation...
Hi Amelie,
beyond the recommendation by Heiko, here are some further references. The Cheung papers are clearly hard to swallow but have some criticisms on the traditional forms. I found the Wilson et al. approach very practical (and do my own MASEMS since than this way). Further, Suzanne Jak has published a book on MASEM. Perhaps worth a look (I hadn't time yet).
At the end of may, the institute in which I work (Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information) organizes a conference on meta-analysis in Dubrovnik. Mike Cheung and Suzanne will also be there. Perhaps you join us.
https://conferences.leibniz-psychology.org/index.php/ressyn/index/schedConfs/archive
HTH
Holger
Cheung, M. W. L. (2002). Meta-analysis for structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Chinese University, Hong Kong.
Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition-performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1035-1070. doi:10.1037/a0028324
Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2018). Accounting for missing correlation coefficients in fixed-effects MASEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(1), 1-14.
Wilson, S. J., Polanin, J. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2016). Fitting meta-analytic structural equation models with complex datasets. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 121-139. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1199
Sheng, Z., Kong, W., Cortina, J. M., & Hou, S. (2016). Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: Current practices and recommendations. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 187-208. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1206
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics
- Statistical Techniques
- Structural Equation Modeling