Hey, I need help! I'm trying to purify two proteins (26 kDa and 96 kDa) using a Ni- NTA resin. Both enzymes have a 6- histidine tag (bioinformatic models shows that the tags are correctly exposed), and the expression occurs in E. coli (strain BL21). The problem I'm having is non- specific binding, the elution come out just as dirty as the original sample or the flow through.

I have tried using two different brands of resin (Quiagen and Cytiva), currently using the last one. I already tried using different buffers (20 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl + 300 mM imidazole for elution, pH 8.4 or 20 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl + 500 mM imidazole for elution, pH 7.4), just as indicated in the manuals.

I tried two methods of cell disruption (lysozyme + freeze and thawing cycles or sonication), thinking that maybe the lysozyme was interfering with the resin's maximum capacity. I've tried doing both -batch and column purification-, and got the same result in both cases. It puzzles me, because my mentor purifies many proteins from E. coli lysates using the same resin and conditions, and she gets good results. We don't know what's failing, I'm going crazy! Will it help adding a nonionic detergent to the elution buffer (e.g., 0.2% Tween- 20)?

These are today's results. I resuspended the bacterial pellet in 50 ml of binding buffer and sonicated it. I centrifuged and passed it through a 5 ml column, with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min and usind an imidazole- gradient elution. (I already tried increasing the flow rate). I got a good peak elution, but when I load the collected fractions on a SDS- Page.. There are a lot of proteins, and they all elute together in one unique peak! (Sorry for the SDS- Page pic, I took it with my phone. Colected fractions are the last five ones).

Thank you in advance, Julieta.

More Julieta Beiro's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions