Hello experts,
I have 100 sets of impedance data plots (data from Lithium ion battery). We know that there are many softwares like Zsimpwin Program, Zview, or EC-lab software to fit equivalent circuits to impedance data (Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy). They fit one curve at a time. I would like to know if some one knows how to automate it (one after the other) instead of fitting each plot manually to Eq Circuit. Any source code or method will be useful and save good time
The opportunity to think a little bit while processing data - in my opinion is not superfluous in scientific activity. To do this, it is enougth to use the ZView. When the equipment measures, and the computer calculate, what the operator is doing? The next stage is creating the software for writing article... Who will be its author?
But seriously, one day I had a dispute with a student who was proving to me that the absolutely insane result of his measurements is correct, since "this computer counted!" Later it was found out that the student was mistaken on the order at input of the initial data. In another case, the resonator washes was "closed" the outstanding discovery. Therefore, IMHO, it is better to participate in measurement and calculations, using both the computer and the brain.
The opportunity to think a little bit while processing data - in my opinion is not superfluous in scientific activity. To do this, it is enougth to use the ZView. When the equipment measures, and the computer calculate, what the operator is doing? The next stage is creating the software for writing article... Who will be its author?
But seriously, one day I had a dispute with a student who was proving to me that the absolutely insane result of his measurements is correct, since "this computer counted!" Later it was found out that the student was mistaken on the order at input of the initial data. In another case, the resonator washes was "closed" the outstanding discovery. Therefore, IMHO, it is better to participate in measurement and calculations, using both the computer and the brain.
All this are true, but nobody canceled the planning of the experiment. Colleague, or/and his boss, do the work on the principle of a bulldozer. Maybe they did not need in so many measurements?
Like most old people, I recall similar cases. Here's one. Once, 30 years ago, my colleague planned her PhD thesis - she measured several properties for the quad chemical system, every 5 percent step. It seemed to her that in this way she would receive exhaustive data. As a result, she just drowned in the materials. The measurements were processed, but not generalized, the thesis was not finished. This lasted 7 years. Now she is a very big figure ... in politics. And, apparently, she has not changed her methods. Perhaps she did not read Jack London's story about the gold digger. I do not remember the story's name, but I remember his method of searching for the gold vein.
The scientist must be clever, and the clever one is always a little bit lazy - this allows him to find the shortest path to the result.
Hello ,
I would use RelaxIS. It is very easy to use and you can do batch fitting with just one click , it is not freeware though and you need to pay 82€ per month to use it.
Other than that, I would write a program to use a freeware and batch the fitting.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Modeling