"How the Cosmology effects on the formation of cosmic architecture values?? could you add an example?"
Of course Big Bang Inflation, and Einstein's cosmological equation adherents claim that both together can explain the present and past observed structures of the universe, but IMO they cannot believably explain (without ad-hoc premises) how the Inflation hypothesis could turn into the universe as we now observe it. The Inflation hypothesis is not based upon known or tested physics.
The Big Bang theory seems to now rest on the validity of a hypothesis, the Inflation hypothesis, with its many versions. A theory that is based upon an unverifiable hypothesis is not theory at all IMO, it is simply a hypothesis, no matter how much evidence is believed to support other aspects of its detail. It is simply a matter of the definitions of a theory and of a hypothesis.
A scientific hypothesis defined: A hypothesis is an idea or explanation that one can test through study and experimentation. A scientific hypothesis is usually something more than an educated guess but less than a well-established theory. An scientifically conceived explanation that cannot be observed or tested is called scientific speculation.
Scientific theory defined: A scientific theory is a synthesis of well-tested and verified hypotheses about some aspect of the natural world. When such a broad scaled scientific hypothesis has shown to be in agreement with observations and testing by competent observers in a series of appropriate examinations, it may become known as a scientific theory.
Scientific speculation defined: Based upon the scientific method, the primary purpose of productive scientific speculation is as a precursor to the formation of one or more scientific hypotheses which can be observed or tested. Not facts or phenomena alone, but their causes are the ultimate objective of the scientific quest and the reason for initial speculations. The spirit of speculation is the same as the spirit of science, the desire to know the causes of things observed or considered.
If any primary foundational support, premise, or hypothesis of a so-called scientific theory cannot be observed or tested in any way, then the so-called theory by definition may not rightfully be more than highly developed speculation.