Conference Abstract should have: A title, introduction, methods, results and conclusions or title, issues, description, lessons learned and next steps.
True or false: the results section summarizes the main outcomes of the study and includes the authors’ interpretation of the results and implications.
True or false: in the conclusion recommendations for further research or next steps can be included.
How do you write a complete conference abstract that is representative of your study/ data or have high chances of an abstract being selected for presentation?
I can bring what is recommended in educational research to the table here in answering your question. I hope you find it useful: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ727552.pdf.
I am also including a current Abstract and Conference Call for Submissions that received high marks from the conference reviewers for the high-profile Online Learning Consortium Innovate Conference 2018 formally the Sloan Consortium: https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/attend-2018/innovate/program/olc-innovate-2018-session-page/?session=4843&kwds=
Best regards,
Debra
I think you should look at those comments from which you can benefit: https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_defines_a_Conference_Paper
A structured abstract is a formal and compact summary of an article’s main features and findings. As does a table or figure, it has a predictable structure that compresses information into a small space and can be read
independent of the main body of the article. The structured abstract is longer and more detailed than the standard paragraph-style narrative summary.
Should we adopt Structured abstract ?? Please give your expert opinion.
Should we adopt Structured abstract ?? Please give your expert opinion.
How should a Conference Abstract be written? Any expert advice?
Conferences usually invite abstracts or extended abstracts. The treatment for these categories are different, but they must be in a structured format. Often, the size of an abstract is 500 words and extended abstract 1000 words. A typical abstract should have information on four aspects; the rationale and main objectives of the study, the materials and methods used, the summary of the results obtained, and finally, the conclusion of the entire work. The title is a part of the abstract; therefore, it should not be repeated. The results should be described in the past tense. Avoid the use of unfamiliar terms, acronyms, and abbreviations in the abstract. If they are to be used at all, they should be defined at first mention. A simple abstract should not have any citation or listing of references.
Normally, an extended abstract should not exceed 1000 words in double space (equivalent to five A4 size pages with double spacing) inclusive of text, tables, and illustrations. In print form, an extended abstract may have a size ranging from 1 to 2 pages. The organization of a typical extended abstract of 1000 words is as follows: (1) the title; (2) Names and addresses of the authors; (3) Introduction (about 100 words); (4) Materials and Methods (about 250 words); (5) Results and Conclusions (about 600 words including tables and illustrations); and (6) References (about 50 words).
Both organizers and authors of abstracts work on the assumption that the original paper would later be sent for publication in primary journals.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Writing