Using Selfies in Research: A Scientific Perspective

Selfies are not typically included in traditional research methodologies, but there are several emerging contexts where self-photography can serve specific scientific purposes. Understanding the distinction between conventional research documentation and selfie-based methods is important for appreciating their limited but legitimate research applications.

Conventional Research Documentation vs. Self-Portraiture

In standard scientific research practice, documentation focuses on systematic data collection, experimental procedures, and objective observations. Traditional research records include planning descriptions, data manipulations, interpretations, and communications among collaborators, but rarely involve researcher self-portraits. The primary goal is to create records that allow replication of procedures and studies by yourself and others.

Legitimate Research Applications of Self-Photography

Ethnographic and Autoethnographic Research

Self-photography has found legitimate applications in autoethnography, where researchers use personal experiences to describe and critique cultural beliefs and practices. This methodology acknowledges the researcher's relationships with others and uses deep self-reflection to examine intersections between self and society.

In ethnographic fieldwork, self-documentation can serve as a methodological tool for understanding workplace activities and social interactions. Researchers have employed "self-photo studies" to understand users' work practices from an ethnographic approach, allowing participants to photograph their own activities while acting as their own investigators.

Science Communication and Public Engagement

Recent research has shown that scientist selfies can positively impact public perceptions of researchers. A study of 1,620 participants found that scientists posting selfies on Instagram were perceived as significantly warmer and more trustworthy, and no less competent, than scientists posting science-only images. Scientists in selfies were particularly effective at reducing perceived symbolic threat from scientists and changing gender science stereotypes when female scientists were featured.

Artistic and Medical Research Applications

Self-portraiture has been used in medical education research, where anatomical self-portraits serve as fieldwork methodology. This involves using photo elicitation to continue interactions with participants, allowing them to reflect on interpretations of their field. Such approaches combine artistic research with scientific observation in medical school settings.

Best Practices for Research Photography

When photography is included in research, it should follow established field documentation principles. Good research photos in fieldwork contexts should:

• Document specific research activities and equipment
• Capture the environmental context of data collection
• Provide visual evidence that supports research findings
• Follow ethical protocols regarding consent and privacy
• Maintain professional standards while conveying research excitement

Limitations and Considerations

It's important to note that selfies should not replace systematic research documentation. The primary focus must remain on creating records that explain what you did, when, why, and how, along with accurate data recording and analysis procedures. Self-photography should only supplement, not substitute for, rigorous research methodologies.

The integration of selfies in research contexts requires careful consideration of ethical implications, research objectives, and disciplinary norms. While they can serve specific purposes in science communication and certain ethnographic studies, they are not appropriate for all research contexts and should be used judiciously based on clear methodological justification.

In conclusion, while selfies are not commonly integrated into traditional research practices, they can serve legitimate purposes in specific contexts such as science communication, ethnographic research, and public engagement initiatives, provided they are implemented with clear scientific rationale and appropriate ethical considerations.

Minister Alexander Ohnemus

Shweta Dwivedi answer was likely drafted by AI (ChatGPT put it around a 70% chance).

• Very “textbook” structure with tidy headings (“In conclusion,” “Limitations and Considerations,” “Best Practices”) and evenly balanced, generic bullet points.
• Claims a precise study result (“1,620 participants…”) but gives no citation, link, author names, venue, or year—common in AI-written summaries.
• Consistent, neutral tone with broad definitions and few concrete examples or quotes; repeats ideas (“supplement, not substitute”) in a templated way.
• Mixes multiple domains (ethnography, medical education, science communication) without diving into any specific methodology details, which is typical of LLM overviews.

Her Disciplines: Botany, Genetics

Cheers

With due respect Sir, I completely agree with your observations. But I am still in the process of learning and trying to explore new aspects, which is why I sometimes seek help from different tools. This also gives me an opportunity to learn more effectively. I have added the references as suggested. I truly appreciate the way you observed and explained the points so clearly, as it will help me to gain a deeper knowledge. Moving forward, I will make sure to be more careful so that no incorrect information is conveyed...... Thank you very much, Sir, for sharing your honest and valuable opinions.

Shweta Dwivedi AI is a helpful tool. But we need to make sure to mark the help of AI in science and personal conversations. If we do not, differentiating human opinion from AI output will become impossible.

Best regards

I will definitely follow your advice. Thank you, Sir.