Aradhya Mahajan I'm sure that you have already been advised but for a Stirling engine operating between 350K and 288K the theoretical maximum thermal efficiency is approx. 17.7%. Please advise the design of the machine that you wish to consider as due to losses the efficiency will be less. The model you have stated does not ring a bell with me. Phillips NV produced a working machine for cryogenic applications many years ago based on the Stirling cycle application (availability/operability not known). Do you have a particular machine in mind that has been manufactured? Stephen Lloyd
The Sterling engine is an interesting theoretical oddity but completely useless from a practical standpoint. The power produced for the size and weight is pathetic. The problem is that you can't "force" heat to transfer rapidly without a large temperature gradient, which defeats the purpose of the cycle.
The mechanical energy produced by a Stirling engine using hot water at around 350K depends on factors like engine efficiency, temperature difference, and design. Generally, small engines might produce a few watts, while larger ones can generate several kilowatts or more. Specific values vary based on these factors.