Not sure that it does. A supervisor who insists on publication at the expense of research progress is nuts (if there is a problem, this may be the root of it!). Usually, publication on the basis of a candidate's research material and data accelerates progress with the thesis or dissertation. Thoughts are clarified, themes put to the test, and modes of expression tested and improved.

Sakarie Mustafe Hidig

"...what strategies can be implemented to ensure a balance between productivity and scholarly rigor?..."

That nasty aphorism "Publish or Perish" is the root of evil. The situation will not change until the academic world turns research into "science of research"

More than a year ago I added the following answer to a related discussion:

"Research is Science.

We have information science, political science, medical science, physics science, social science, engineering science... but neglected greatly is RESEARCH SCIENCE. While all the sciences above and all others that I, you and others know, rely on research, for advancement of an academic field itself and of course the society.

Why it lacks creativity, because, we don't learn research systematically, in part.

At most we learn research methods at universities. Have you ever wondered, that we are teaching and also learning methods of the thing (research) that never have been taught?

Search for scholarly books and articles on topics of 1- research and then 2-research methods, or research methodology. how many will you find to tell you, me and other about the nature, theoretical and fundamental issues of the notion RESEARCH itself. I mean, its quiddity.

Search for universities that have departments or colleges just for research. find them all, please inform all of us.

The case of journals and those involved in them is the same. They have not learned research systematically, because there is not any department in any university, with specified courses for them. Therefore editors and reviewers act according to the standard that they have accepted for themselves. Some may be apparent to us. But most of them are not, they are in the mind of those officials of journals themselves.

Look at this claim please, as there are many reports about it.

If they want, like and understand a paper, there are chances for publication for it,

NOW AGAIN

If they want, like and understand a paper, there are zero chances for publication. But later some researcher from a part of world shares information via internet, that his/her manuscript has been published, in other journals, in other parts of world, with names of others as authors, Then scandal starts...

Certainly your questions are relevant, but should not we first go for this

What is research?

seems very easy and simple, the answer to it, first,

but when we go through it, we understand how difficult even to understand it. That is why we have too many frauds and misconducts, plagiarism, data fabrication, authorship matters (3G+H authorship) just in case of publications, put away now products and services of science.

To be honest, for me this is the greatest mystery of the world of academia all over the world. Why we are asked and we ask for the products of something (research), that we have never learned! worse is that our earth, life, current and future tied to it.

I have extensively written about these issues in my own published works and also, more in details and up-to-date in my own initiated RG discussions and answers to others discussions in RG. If anyone interested."

* Source: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_research_art

Rahim Alijani

It's clear that you've put a lot of thought into the systemic issues surrounding research and scholarly rigor. Your emphasis on the need for a deeper understanding of the nature of research itself is crucial. Indeed, the aphorism "Publish or Perish" often seems to prioritize quantity over quality, which can undermine the integrity of academic work.

Developing a "science of research" as you suggest would involve not only teaching research methods but also delving into the underlying principles and theories of research itself. This could help foster a more creative and rigorous approach to academic inquiry. your point about the lack of structured education and departments specifically dedicated to research is well-taken. Without proper training and institutional support, it's difficult for researchers, editors, and reviewers to consistently uphold scholarly standards.Moreover, fostering a culture of transparency and accountability within the academic community is essential. This includes addressing issues such as fraud, misconduct, and unethical authorship practices.

Sakarie Mustafe Hidig

"It's clear that you've put a lot of thought into the systemic issues surrounding research and scholarly rigor"

Yes you are right and thank you for your understanding. It was about 1987 and in my early 20s. At that time I was student of Shiraz teacher training collage. There we had a psychology professor a Mr. "Mansour Owji" (1937-2021). He was also a well-known poet. In one of his classes, he talked about one of his published books that had been stolen (plagiarized) completely and published cover to cover with other names as authors. It came to me very strange, why people do plagiarize? why they themselves don't write books? and more questions. I can remember that I asked Mr. Owji some questions about that matter and as a source of curiosity I tried to understand, read and learn more about the nature of plagiarization. So my journey about understanding the nature of research and any thing surrounding it started then.

Some times honest researchers recognize the importance of what I share, but they want to collaborate for publishing books and articles, while what I have in mind is way too far bigger than just publishing some books and articles. In part for example From launching a TV or TVs dedicated to programs on "real research and science" to launching BA and MA on Science of Research" in universities, from related courses dedicated to understanding of children to courses for adults and those who go to public libraries, also Research journalism, scientometric journalism, to name just a few.

For every question to pass and transit to a new world of "real research" I have answers. But you know it is like "to rack a boat"... so maybe people in the world of academia don't like and don't want these things and changes.

To be concise, if any recognized university or higher education system around the world want to know more, I am willing to share, what I know and what could be done practically.

Rahim Alijani Thank you for sharing your journey and insights into the world of research and academia. It's unfortunate to hear about instances of plagiarism and the challenges it poses to originality and intellectual integrity.

Your aspirations for promoting genuine research and scientific understanding through various mediums such as TV programs, dedicated courses, and research journalism are commendable. It's crucial to foster a culture that values and supports authentic research endeavors.

While the academic landscape may sometimes resist change, there are certainly individuals and institutions open to innovative ideas and approaches to advancing knowledge. Your willingness to share your knowledge and practical solutions could undoubtedly benefit those seeking to enhance their educational programs and research practices.

Laurence Wright You make a valid point about the delicate balance between publication and research progress, especially in the context of academic supervision. Indeed, a supervisor's insistence on publication without due consideration for the progress of the research itself can be detrimental. Publication should ideally complement and enhance the research process rather than hinder it. As you rightly mentioned, sharing research findings through publication can often lead to valuable insights, clarification of thoughts, rigorous testing of themes, and improvement in modes of expression. This iterative process can contribute significantly to the refinement and advancement of the research work itself.

it's essential for supervisors to maintain a supportive and constructive approach, ensuring that publication goals align with the overall progress and goals of the research project. I believe a collaborative and balanced approach that values both the quality of research output and the advancement of research progress is key to ensuring the success and impact of academic endeavors.