The answer to this question is complex, as stigma and discrimination impact LGBTQ2S+ healthcare access and attainment at nearly every level imaginable. Additionally, the mechanisms of this cannot be easily collapsed into a neat LGBT etc. umbrella, as different identity groups face vastly different healthcare needs and experiences. Importantly, collapsing all LGBTQ2S+ identities into a single health conversation often results in an oversimplification and erasure which leaves the most vulnerable groups unconsidered.

That said, one way medical facilities can improve LQBTQ2S+ care is to promote inclusive language on medical forms and in verbal interactions. Individuals are unlikely to correct cisnormative and heteronormative language, and often read such language as a signal that they are not safe to fully discuss their needs and medical histories with providers. When providers ask questions that invite patients to disclose their pronouns, gender experiences, and sexualities (rather than making assumptions), patients are more likely to trust the providers, do follow-up care, and seek healthcare in the future.