Do you think God's aseity is incompatible with the existence of uncreated abstract objects (e.g., laws of logic, numbers, sets, moral values, and other universals), as found in Platonism?
May be , at least in my religion we have certain forms of god who represent abstractness of Bhrama (creator) again people argue even the other two are forming a trinity !!!
Numbers are for gruha (planets ) . I like 9 , it represents a Guru (teacher) or called as Bhrahspati .
We have gods for everything - inside our homes who bless us
Moral - Kala (Yama) god of death and his accountant Chitragupta
Not to miss the various symbols from Om to many many that are popular in Germany too :)
The writer and Arab thinker Abbas Akkad says in the origin of the divine belief that the man lived in the beliefs as well as the sciences and industries, the writer dealt with the stages of divine doctrine since the beginning of belief in pluralism,, and the second stage is the stage of discrimination and weightiness, which is the belief in pluralism with the emergence and sway of one of those gods to be the greatest of them, and even that reached the stage of unification and knowledge of the one God ,at this stage with the rest of the nation to worship one God and reach the nation to this unity only after the times and civilizations in which knowledge and thought is common and it is impossible for the mind to accept what was prevalent in the primitive civilizations of superstition, and begins man in this new stage and with being incomplete, of perfection and sanctification.
If I understand the divine aseity as: Attribute of God, by which it exists by itself; it is compatible with the existence of abstract objects not created by God, but created by Man (logic, numbers, moral values and ethical principles)
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Philosophy