I have the finished mitochondrial genome by de novo assembly with next-generation sequencing data. While annotating protein-coding gene in the mitochondrial genome, I use MITOS and DOGMA to predict the regions of protein-coding genes. In addition, I also use blastn and tblastn with reference genome for validation. Unfortunately, there is no consistent result among MITOS, DOGMA, blastn and tblastn. Any input is welcome.

More Yu-Feng Huang's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions