"How do we understand special relativity?"

The Quantum FFF Model differences: What are the main differences of Q-FFFTheory with the standard model? 1, A Fermion repelling- and producing electric dark matter black hole. 2, An electric dark matter black hole splitting Big Bang with a 12x distant symmetric instant entangled raspberry multiverse result, each with copy Lyman Alpha forests. 3, Fermions are real propeller shaped rigid convertible strings with dual spin and also instant multiverse entanglement ( Charge Parity symmetric) . 4, The vacuum is a dense tetrahedral shaped lattice with dual oscillating massless Higgs particles ( dark energy). 5, All particles have consciousness by their instant entanglement relation between 12 copy universes, however, humans have about 500 m.sec retardation to veto an act. ( Benjamin Libet) It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form. Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles. 6 David Bohm suggested in contrast with The "Copenhagen interpretation", that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and second: elementary particles should be "guided by a pilot wave". John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real "Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable contraction. Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum. He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum. However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility, that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and a new dual universal Bohmian "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living in dual universes.

Reply to this discussion

Vacuum

Multiverse

Entanglement

Big Bang

Motion

Following

Share

All replies (40)

📷

Wolfgang Konle added a reply

5 days ago

Fred-Rick Schermer "It does not explain how all got started up, but then again I also have Energy as a given. I recognize your model as complete on its own, leaving some aspects unexplained."

Good question, an answer and some additional explanations can be given in short words.

There was no startup. The model is eternal.

The background of dark energy distorts space into an S³ structure with a space curvature of 1/R² and a volume of 2π²R³. The volume of space oscillates. It shrinks as the dark energy is charged and expands during a recycling event.

The transfer of the upload energy takes place via a gravitational interaction. With its gravitational field, each particle, including photons, creates a tiny dent in the dark energy density. If this dent moves, the dark energy has to bypass the dent. The bypass motion requires some energy, which must be provided by the moving gravitating object.

A recycling event lasts a few million years. The energy charging phase lasts about twenty to thirty billion years. We are currently in this phase.

Recommend

Share

📷

Fred-Rick Schermer added a reply

5 days ago

Wolfgang Konle

Thank you, Wolfgang, I understand better now what you are working with.

… Read more

Recommend

Share

📷

Cosmin Visan added a reply

2 days ago

Fred-Rick Schermer Universe doesn't exist. "Universe" is just an idea in consciousness.

… Read more

Recommend

Share

📷

Cosmin Visan added a reply

2 days ago

Wolfgang Konle Energy doesn't exist. "Energy" is just an idea in consciousness.

… Read more

Recommend

Share

📷

Sergey Shevchenko added a reply

1 day ago

It looks as that rather strange series of posts in the thread is too long already, and to point here that the thread question rather in detail is scientifically answered in SS 5 posts series on page 1, and on page 2..

Cheers

… Read more

Recommend

Share

📷

Fred-Rick Schermer added a reply

1 day ago

Wolfgang Konle

Wolfgang, will you please read this article in which I propose the inverse for explaining a Black Hole.

All data is the same, but the perspective is distinct.

It's like Rubin's Vase, where one can see a Vase, but another can see the Two Faces. All data is the same, but the view is distinct nevertheless.

Same for the Black Hole. I can see the Black Eye instead, with all data exactly the same, yet the perspective is what makes the view different.

There is truly no invisible mass required to explain everything we observe.

Preprint On The Scientific Black Eye

This may be my most important work. It puts me in opposition to the majority (nearly everyone) of the scientific community.

Thank you for your review.

Recommend

Share

📷

Cosmin Visan added a reply

24 hours ago

Fred-Rick Schermer Energy doesn't exist. "Energy" is just an idea in consciousness. See my paper "How Self-Reference Builds the World".

… Read more

Recommend

Share

📷

Wolfgang Konle added a reply

12 hours ago

Fred-Rick Schermer

I have scanned your article about a "black eye".

But I could not identify the differences between your black eye model and the black hole model described in standard physics.

I have looked for differences in energy, mass, momentum, momentum of inertia, and external impact on the galaxy. But I could not find any substantial information about that kind of differences.

Recommend

Share

📷

Cosmin Visan added a reply

9 hours ago

Wolfgang Konle Energy doesn't exist. "Energy" is just an idea in consciousness. See my paper "How Self-Reference Builds the World".

… Read more

Recommend

Share

📷

Fred-Rick Schermer added a reply

5 hours ago

Wolfgang Konle

Excellent, Wolfgang. You make me happy with that response, though I need to mention just a little more.

The Black Hole model contains an event horizon, whereas the Black Eye does not contain an event horizon.

There are two important positions which I describe as follows:

1. A Black Eye is a phenomenon like the Eye of the Storm is a phenomenon. The Eye of the Storm is really there, but it is not based on itself. The Eye is based on the wind force of the Storm. Inside the Eye, there is no wind force. Hence, it is a phenomenon, a byproduct of larger circumstances. It should be considered a major observation that physical realities can produce phenomena that then 'exist' in their larger context.

2. When a person closes an eye, then one can see what a Cyclops sees. Yet the eye that is open did not move toward the center of the face, so the reality of a Cyclops will not be achieved. That means that when an ordinary physical property among others is declared to be zero, then the remaining physical properties do not realign themselves around a center. There is no realigning. The physical reality remains intact, and the zero reality of a physical property cannot be used to declare how the standard reality is then something that it cannot be (i.e. singularities are outcomes on paper only; no scientific grounds were produced to declare singularities scientifically correct).

I do not undermine the Black Hole model other than proposing a better model in which there is no event horizon to consider. All is scientifically present in the Black Eye model. There is nothing to believe in the Black Eye model, while there is something to believe in the Black Hole model, and believing is of course a non-scientific activity.

Thank you, Wolfgang, for your reply.

Will you respond further based on what I wrote here above?

Recommend

Share

On The Scientific Black Eye

A Black Hole is accepted in science by most physicists. Not many people suspect that an alternate model is available based on the same data, called a Black Eye.

The Black Eye model does not contain a mass in the center. The model is not based on a single mass. Rather, the outcome is explained based on the entire system, and for this article that system is a galaxy.

The Black Eye model takes a system-wide approach and bases the resulting outcome on all masses in a galaxy. The gravitational forces of all masses combined establish a collective gravitational depression in the center. In this model, we are witnessing a collective result.

Meanwhile, an additional component is involved as well, not considered by most physicists to play an important role. Next to the ordinarily considered motions of matter, a galaxy as a whole is also on the move through space in a single direction. This helps to establish a special outcome, right in the center.

Note that there is no difference in data between a Black Hole and a Black Eye. It is all in the scientific interpretation that the distinction between both models comes about. Like Rubin’s Vase, one can see a Vase, or one can see Two Faces. Either way, the data is identical.

--

Most will be familiar with the Black Hole model, so the emphasis for this article will be on presenting the Black Eye model.

The starting point is not the gravitational monster itself, but rather the circumstances of a galaxy as a whole.

The Milky Way contains about 100 billion stars and all of these stars have their own gravitational force, attracting all other masses. Yet as a collective, the center of this gravitational force establishes a deep depression.

· The pull on the center is enormous, coming from all directions in the galactic disk. The explanation that not all masses move toward the center with that pulling force is due to the circular motion of this collective, countering the action. Most masses are pushed out by the circular motion and pulled in by the gravitational force.

A depression is made up of various components. The most important aspect for understanding the Black Eye model is that the center of the depression is void of materials, except for happenstance materials (more on this later).

The center exists in a gravitational balance, called net-zero, yet the depression is experienced at its gravitational maximum. That net-zero reality takes up space; it is not a singular point, but rather an area, an Eye of net-zero gravitational force.

Perhaps a surprise, but at the exact spot of first moving away from the net-zero location, all hell breaks loose.

· This sudden boundary shift is like the shift seen with the inner core of planet Earth, with the solid part of the inner core located in the center flanked right around it by the fluid part of the inner core. The center is solid, not moving internally, while the fluid part is moving wildly. There is no transition zone right at the shift of both parts of the inner core.

The same shift occurs between non-motion in center /wild motion right next to it in the gravitational depression. In the center, there is net-zero gravity, not experiencing gravity. Right on the edge of it the gravitational force is exerted to its max. There is no greater gravitational expression in the entire galaxy than right here next to the net-zero location.

What happens right next to this edgy spot is that friction has become available whereas no friction is available anywhere inside the net-zero center. As soon as that friction is available, there is motion, lots and lots of it. All tension of all masses in the entire galaxy is kept at net-zero in the center and breaks loose with a fury at first opportunity.

For the Black Eye model, one can declare that edgy spot a gravitational Wall of Motion. The photons seen in images of a Black Hole/Black Eye show us the Wall of Motion. As is well-known, we only see photons when they move in our direction. This is a location of great turbulence.

📷

In the Black Eye model, photons will in general not make it through the center because the gravitational Wall of Motion will swat them out of the way before a photon can reach the center. As such, the Eye will be black. Meanwhile, the Wall of Motion in which the photons are swatted into our direction ensures that the ring of light (the donut) is visible to us. Thanks to the way photons works, we can see the ring of light, the Wall of Motion.

· Further out, photons continue on their straight path all around the Black Eye and Wall of Motion. As long as they are not swatted by the Wall of Motion, and when photons are not aimed toward us, we do not get to see them.

Once more, the most important aspect is the center at net-zero. This net-zero location is the solid backbone of all gravitational masses moving around it. In a way, all masses are moving around the gravitational center. Each mass is attracted both by the center and by all other specific masses in the galaxy. As such, specific individual behavior by a mass can also get established in this setting.

A partial collective of masses in the galaxy, when placed in opposite location to the center, can move any single mass individually as well. That means that for a single mass, the majority of the galaxy can end up establishing the direction that pulls this mass toward the center. As a result, a single mass may end up with a specific behavior in light of the net-zero center.

📷

In a visualization with a clock, this is like a single mass located at 2 o’clock being attracted via gravity through the large center location of the clock by the other side. Yet it is not just the masses located at 8 o’clock that are doing the attracting. It is more like all masses between 5 and 11 o’clock are attracting the single mass at 2 o’clock. Masses found at 7 o’clock or 10 o’clock would also be pulling the single mass at 2 o’clock in their direction.

Similarly, the mass at 2 o’clock is contributing (its very small part) to the attraction on all these masses between 5 and 11 o’clock. It will do so as part of its majority of masses of a galaxy. A mass at 8 o’clock will be pulled by all masses situated between 11 o’clock and 5 o’clock, including the single mass at 2 o’clock.

This is therefore a story of the single mass being attracted by the many in opposite direction, while the single mass contributes itself, as part of the many in opposition, to each and every other mass in their specific opposite location.

Once more, it is the circular motion that keeps all masses where they are. The inward pull by all masses is countered by the outward motion of the circular motion of all masses.

Through happenstance, a single mass may no longer follow the established path and become attracted to the very center of all masses in the galaxy. Yet when that mass reaches the center, it will still move around it. The single mass reverts direction in a smooth but perhaps rather fast transition.

In a static view, the exact center has an attraction that is equidistant in all directions of the galaxy. As such, a single mass will bypass the center in a circular motion, reversing direction, exactly because there is no single mass of attraction. This is a collective outcome played out on an individual mass.

Interestingly, the net-zero location can be entered also by a mass, yet this cannot happen at great velocity. At great velocity, the mass will always move around the net-zero center.

Yet when a slowly and gradually moving mass enters the net-zero location, it can get stuck on the ‘wrong’ side of the Wall of Motion.

· Like an airplane flying straight into the Eye of the Storm perhaps not encountering much trouble, when flying out back into the Storm the plane better not enter it at the wrong angle where the force can overwhelm it. Indeed, it is dangerous work for these pilots.

Naturally, a mass that ‘fell’ into a Black Eye will not have a steering wheel available and will not be able to exit the Black Eye exactly as desired. In short, it will not exit in a single piece.

📷

That mass will get churned into pieces. Some of it will fly right back into the galactic disk, unnoticed, yet a good amount can move outwardly through the perpendicular spouts. These spouts are located on both sides of the net-zero location in the galactic disk, themselves also net-zero areas. What propels these churned pieces is nothing but the speed the pieces achieved from the churning motion in their direction. Once more, the Wall of Motion will not let any mass escape whole once it entered the net-zero location.

To understand how a galactic system can establish a Black Eye, it is not sufficient to understand the gravitational motions only. A galaxy, or any matter in the universe, is always on the move. There truly exists no matter at a standstill.

The entire galaxy of, for instance, the 100 billion stars of the Milky Way, are on the move collectively, moving through space in what is basically a straight line.

This is the fastest speed that all these Milky Way masses are moving in. The outer regions of the galaxy are moving at the same speed as all other masses in the galaxy in that single direction.

· Like ice-skaters on a frozen canal, each skating under his- or her own force, all are moving like a group and yet there is no group force. There appears to be a group, but a single skater can stop skating on his or her own accord, with the remainder of the group continuing. There is no group powering the skaters.

The initial ‘push’ established by the Big Bang materialization process got applied to all Milky Way energy, moving it in one and the same direction, at one and the same speed. Therefore, it appears that there is a group that is powered by group action. Yet the group action that we see, the circling of these masses, is based on gravity. For the skaters, we see the evidence of their being a group when they are jostling or helping propel each other. Yet in general, each skater skates on their own power.

· The original push of the Big Bang is not based on gravity.

The true motions of all masses in the Milky Way are more complex than considered in our Einsteinian view of matter in which gravity is the essential force.

On the one hand, there is the fastest motion of all masses moving in the same direction at the same speed at the same time. On the other hand, there is the gravitational motion indeed that attracts these masses to one another.

· A circular motion is the result of both realities combined.

In the center, there will be a net-zero location, and this will not be based just on gravity, but based on the established circular motion, which includes the single and fastest direction that all galactic matter is moving into.

--

Why did physicists consider there is a Black Hole instead of a Black Eye?

The answer lies in our achieving answers not just based on what we observe in reality, but also in our doing calculations on paper. When all the data is transposed onto paper, then one facilitates an environment in which is it easy to make a simple but fatal mistake.

Consider a piece of paper with a face drawn on it: two ears, hair, a nose, an eye, a mouth and chin.

All parts are scientifically correct.

And yet when there is just a single eye in the face, then the drawing shows us a Cyclops. It does not matter that the eye itself is scientifically correct. The drawing shows an outcome that does not corroborate what we witness in nature.

When all data about a galaxy is expressed in correct calculations on paper, then a melding of data into a single mass can still make the outcome become incorrect. The worst part of the Black Hole calculations is accepting that for the Cyclops the single eye sits in the middle of a face.

Naturally, it is easy to see what a Cyclops sees. All one needs to do is close an eye and we see exactly what a Cyclops sees.

· Yet the mistake is to think that the remaining open eye moved to the center of our faces.

The model demands therefore that all that is real remains in place, even when there is an established outcome of zero for whichever aspect that one has considered essential in a physical environment. The zero presence of any aspect does not allow us to eliminate the zero location from our equations.

· We are not allowed to play with models at will.

It is easy to undermine the Black Hole model with the Black Eye model, just like it is easy to undermine the Vase with the Two Faces. Only one outcome will be correct, and yet the data shows us two possibilities.

How to pick the best possible outcome?

The scientific weak spot in the Black Hole model is that the entity that establishes the scientific Black Hole cannot be shown itself. The event horizon prevents any fully scientific acknowledgment to ever occur. The Black Hole model contains a curtain beyond which no scientific access can be obtained, except on paper. That makes it a weak scientific model because the scientific essence is not available.

The Black Eye model does not suffer this scientific problem. All data is out there in the open. Everything is explained.

The real distinction is in the interpretation of the data.