I am working on a very simple model of a granular solid made of Lennard-Jones particles, i.e. the non-bonded interaction of these particles is given by the simple, standard shifted, purely repulsive LJ potential, which reads: 4\epsilon ( (\sigma/r)^12 - (\sigma/r)^6) + epsilon. The potential, as usual is cut off at its minimum distance sqrt[6]{2}. Of course, as usual, sigma determines the length scale, i.e the diameter of particles and epsilon determines the energy scale.

Now, a non-trivial problem occurs, when simulating, say a cube of LJ particles (which in our case are subject to shock waves via impact) and you want to map this chunk of matter to a real material, say some kind of rock material, or to be more specific, aluminum for example. 

The thing is, that the length scale can easily be mapped by just claiming that the simulation cube corresponds to, say a cube of aluminum (which has a certain density in absolute units) of 1 m^3. That defines (via the number of particles) the length sigma.

But... How does one obtain a mapping of the energy scale, i.e. what is the energy of epsilon, when I want to map it to a real material, e.g. aluminum with known density and volume ? We need this epsilon to determine our time scale in the simulation, i.e. to map our simulation time unit t* to a unit of time t in absolute (real units). The formula for that is t* = t (epsilon / m / sigma^2)^1/2. So, if we knew epsilon, we could map our time scale to a real system.

In literature, I discovered, that the authors NEVER seem to disclose the method of mapping their LJ-unit to a real system. They just state their simulation time step in absolute units as a matter of fact (which means they must have mapped epsilon as well). That is why one does not know how, e.g. the authors can claim that their simulation timestep is supposed to be, e.g. 10^{-12} seconds when they simulated a generic fcc crystal and then claim that this is supposed to be a chunk of Fe of such and such dimensions.

I'd appreciate any specific ideas how to perform this mapping of a LJ simulation time scale to a real time scale (which involves first mapping epsilon to a real system, which seems to be the actual problem).

Similar questions and discussions