Peer-reviewed articles are the currency of science. They create knowledge and enable discovery. Despite this fundamental role, peer-reviewed articles tend to be written in a dry, dense, and impersonal style that can be challenging to read and understand. There are many potential benefits for writing in a more accessible style, from promoting much-needed communication among disciplines to making science more accessible to a broader community. But good writing takes time for both the author who writes it and the institutions that teach it.

More Md. Nur Alam Miah's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions