School health researchers can reduce bias by having multiple team members review and code the interviews independently and cross check for the mistakes, we would have zoom calls for the same , using software tools like Atlas ti (The web version gave independence of sharing the files with all the research team or Invivo also helps for systematic analysis, and by verifying emerging themes with stakeholders where possible (Creswell & Poth, 2018).

All the above explained are good practices for team based research work, in my case since it was scholar work, had to slog a little for feedback from outsiders or friend circles who are working on qualitative research work.

More Anitha Roshan Sagarkar's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions