The balance or degree of the researcher is raised in the Kitter by quoting, how is the quotation from the research of others? All opinions and answers are welcome
Quoting from other's research is called secondary sourcing. Secondary sourcing should be covered both in the form of a citation and a reference. This practice is generally discouraged because a preference should be given to the original text also called the primary source.
Thank you "dear" Dear Culzar Shah, Zainab A Makawi, Nour Shakir, Timothy Omara, Joshua O. lgalo, Segun Michael Abegunde for your kind contributions and appreciation
Thank you "very much" to all researchers and academics for their active and active contributions, thank you "very much" to everyone for the substantive and pleasant discussion
The most important idea is to quote from the original reference and give the credit to the author. The ways of documentations are known to all, specially the PhD holders.
Any direct quote of 5 or more words should be enclosed with double quotes" " as well as proper citation provided including the page number where the quote can be found. In some cases it is perfectly valid and legitimate to quote directly (following the citation protocol) so that somehting is not lost in translation. Direct quotes are less frequently found in science/engineering publication and more often in the field of humanities and social sciences.
Our research program is certainly a very vast areas covering the knowledge in the entire global areas . Views are expressed ,views ideas & knowledge also come in the way of our expressing scientific review & for this if some recent review helps us to expand for the knowledge & new presentation for our thinking phase it is desirable that we should certainly quote the most recent research in the field .