There are many ways!, but it always depends upon what data you have (for systematic review) and what data you want to include (as said by Carlos Renato Moreira-Maia in his answer).
I suppose it depends on what you mean by table. If you are trying to produce forest plots then I would suggest using something like RevMan or Comprehensive Meta-Analysis which produces very nice forest plots and funnel plots. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis had much more functionality than RevMan and allows you to do metaregressions as well and thus is better. RevMan is freeware while CMA is not, however.
If you want to make forest plots with already run meta-analysis then excel will do it or graphpad is another good way to put in the numbers (odds ratio and 95% CI) after analysis is already run) and produce forest plots .
in my review, data of 4 systematic review with meta-analysis & 9 narrative reviews of previously published will be included. The suggestion given by both of u is really helpful. thank you very much for that. I wanna use revman5 but using it will lessen the acceptance level for publication?
1.Work out what it is that interests you with this type of literature. You are looking for answers, these are your outcome variables. Create a table that contains the relevant information for that. 2,You are perhaps looking for factors affecting outcome. Work out which ones they could be and create a column for each of them. Use these to describe the articles in your review.3.You are probably only interested in the better studies, because of the rubbish-in-rubbish-out phenomenon. Work out what methodological points make a good study. There are many checklists that you can use as an indication of what to look for, different ones for different study designs. 4. If your review is simplistic you only need a word table, if you need to calculate or move things easily, use Excel but there are also various soft-ware programs for this.
There are many ways!, but it always depends upon what data you have (for systematic review) and what data you want to include (as said by Carlos Renato Moreira-Maia in his answer).