17 October 2020 2 8K Report

I’m currently reading an article (Meeus et al., 2009, Study 1; see below) that hypothesised for interaction effects, but failed to find any. What’s puzzling me is the entry of variables into the moderated regression and their interpretation after no interactions were found:

Step 1: Gender

Step 2: Predictor Variables

Step 3: Experimental Condition (Dummy)

Step 4: Two-Way Interactions (Predictors x Dummy)

Step 5: Three-Way Interactions (etc)

Having failed to find a significant interaction, the authors discuss Model 3 – the one with the dummy-coded condition. Is this correct? How is Model 3 to be interpreted? I ask because I have a very similar study that also failed to find any interactions, but the predictors explain a large amount of variance in one group, but not the other (if I were to run two separate HMRs). I was wondering in what way I could report this.

Meeus, J., Duriez, B., Vanbeselaere, N., Phalet, K., and Kuppens, P. (2009). Examining Dispositional and Situational Effects on Outgroup Attitudes. European Journal of Personality. 23 (4), p307-328.

More Ross Anon's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions