When a Shapiro Wilk test output reads: .638, does it look normal? Yes, it conveys a message that the data of the variable involved is (almost perfectly?!) normally distributed, thus, parametric tests can be carried out, though it felt something was peculiar with that high result.

Is this perfectly normal? Or is there something wrong, maybe, related to the actual data entry/coding procedure, which could lead to (such if proven) awkwardness?

I hope I made my point clear. I hope to gain an insight too.