A class of sophisticated networks known as progressive networks are delineated by a power-law degree distribution, aka hubs, with an extensive number of connections (Barabási & Albert, 1999). This fundamental structural feature significantly impacts network behavior and resilience in social and biological frameworks. Interactions among hubs, including data dissemination, community-building, and effectiveness in withstanding sporadic node failures (Barabási & Albert, 1999), stem social networks' conservative properties. However, targeted assaults, such as the systematic elimination of certain central nodes, may lead to adverse network fragmentation consequences. According to Jeong et al. (2001), numerous essential proteins and metabolites operate as fundamental topological hubs in biological frameworks, making the network particularly vulnerable to pathologies that target these hubs in light of the power-law degree distribution present in complicated frameworks.
In connection with these hubs, the small-world property facilitates communication and signal propagation among most network nodes, underpinning rapid information transfer and reaction. Hierarchical modularity in scale-free networks is characterized by the combination of hub nodes and community groupings, which resemble structural organization, for instance in social and biological networks structures. Accordingly, scale-free networks provide a vital framework for comprehending convoluted network interactions by featuring heterogeneous connection layouts, robustness, selective vulnerability, and optimal information flow (Watts & Strogatz, 1998).
References:
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512.
Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2001). Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature, 411(6833), 41-42.
Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167-256.
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440-442.