Recent strike in Tamilnadu and it's slavery.
When the civil servants announce the fight, the public community is split into two, criticizing a faction of the state and continuing to blame the other fugitives. The contradiction is that there is truth in the argument being taken on both sides. But what is not considered in these affairs is the lack of understanding we have in government, power and rights.
First of all, our interest in government work is not as pertaining to the likelihood of luxury as we think. It came with a dreamer of authority on it. The social acceptance of it and the source of its existence comes through the longing. A computer engineer who earns three lakh rupees a month may be more than double the monthly salary of a District Collector. But when it comes to power, a software maker is not in any way indifferent.
This is exactly the same as that of all stakeholders. A private sweeping government is not the one to blaze. On the same basis, a government school teacher and a private school teacher are not one.
Here, the main question that the general public should ask is whether we know the difference between the state and the government servant. Today, Girija Vaidyanathan has thrown temporary employees of the temporary staff involved in the struggle. What does this mean? Who is the state here? What is a fighting party or a disadvantage of them? Both are the same.
Because this is a power hierarchy. That is the state's operating system. From top to bottom is its operating system. A decision-making party and another party to execute it. When the two sides come into conflict, the decision-making party holds the power that it holds.
This is the most precise place where the general community fails. The reason is that the people who face the public society are always the same as the implementing party. They are more than ninety percent of the state party. Furthermore, there is the assumption that the state of employment is a work that has the power over others. That's wrong.
The state job is, on the contrary, the condition of direct slavery. But it creates a tricky equation to keep them from leaving. However, if a person who delivers himself to slavery, he will be allowed to reproach one another. If he is not given such an opportunity, he can not maintain the balance of the state apparatus. The state machine can not function.
That is why we see that power in the specific organs of the state, wherever the power accumulates, has the power to act as the same as its extension. An example is the military, police and judiciary. A police constable and another government office guard is not one. But if the environment to be subordinate to his superiors, a Phoenix is in a better position than a police constable. The slavery of our Justice Department, which teaches justice to the world, can not say words.
Thus, the state is a machine that operates with its specific arrangements with a specific violence. Each spare part collectively ensures that the machine is functioning through its work. So we have to understand that in the real sense. From there we can understand the justification of a struggle or its injustice.
In this background we will try to understand the struggle of government employees, including the "teachers" of now. In the struggle now, government teachers are only a part. More and more government employees are fighting. But why do only the authors look to the critics of the critics?
Teacher work is a luxury "public intellect". Even if it is somewhat loyal. Twenty years ago, the teaching work was understood as "charity and dedication". The minimum wage was given to the work. The teacher was satisfied with the social status of the post, rather than the salary of a teacher.
Only ninety years later, significant payments began to occur in their salaries. This does not mean that governments began to show concern for them. On the contrary, when the states begin to quit his responsibility to provide education, it is realistic that the construction of a magic of higher wages is built upon teachers. The preparations for the teachers' salaries, the governments escaped from their responsibility.
Only after the dedication to the new economic policy, the meaning of education is changed. Education principles changed as the basis for the education of knowledge, anthropology, equality and "preparing for competition." The market for education here was created by the government's policy. That's the market.
If the education market is emerging, it is the market for the business that will be seen by the business establishment. That is how private schools were created. If the government is in the forefront of the development of the market, it encouraged private schools to increase the viability of state schools.
If we look at it, it will be understood that our governments have not done any role to improve the infrastructure of the state schools. They only increased the salary of the teachers. Thereby hiding them in front of the general community and hiding their liability.
On the one hand, the Government created the impression that the teachers were paid salaries on the other, allowing the government to slash. The government also built a fake image of "the ability of a teacher to master a state school, only the skills of teachers". Today, the government has ensured that the government is allergic to the public community on government teachers.
Thus, public school teachers were isolated in two ways. One thing is that they are a member of the state and have become moral responsibility for the violence of the state. It was through the public discontent. Second, they lost the right to voicate and violate any violations in the workplace. They have also lost their moral voice to say "these modern education principles are anti-human." The government has succeeded in bringing them into a working-class workers, such as a factory worker.
Thereby making the editorial "social status". By doing so, they were held guilty before the general community. This is the fountain of the voices of the reproach against their struggle today.
What's the way we lose what we lost?
At first, the teacher was not just a manufacturer, but we lost a social unit in his creative work. The new generations of teachers today have no compromise. The censorship of today's faculty is not less than the myth of the general community. Only they can not be held accountable. Because we have some other points to focus on a situation where the state is being altered.
Only the small teachers retain themselves when the functioning of the entire state creates its agenda to dilute the soul of the faculty. They are our apprentices at all times. This does not mean that others should be abandoned.
But the general public, which is shocking at the teachers, is counting only a part of their degeneracy. Most importantly, it forgets the word "self-examination". The awareness community does not have to know how far we have come from the basics of education. That is why it is the outburst of questions that will be raised towards the state, and it is emerging in the face of a false image.
Very few questions!
Does not the government share the role of the private schools today? Was it the way for their payment and the government's departure from education? Who has created a situation where private schools are the only way to go?
Will the government become a people's state if they save the teachers' salaries if they close the government schools that do not fall?
Is it justified by the general community that it is their own self-confidence that the only class teachers who fight against it will be justified by the opposite of private schools and government schools,
What does the government try to achieve through anarchic public opinion by way of lifting the status of private school teachers who are being slaughtered as slaves, build state school teachers as their enemies?
These are the conversations that should be started here. The government can suppress this struggle. Or temporarily concede. But the situation is worse than we think.
Dear Ali Ahmadi, Thanks for your advise. I will go through it and come up with more points. My suggestion is most of the things written in paper or articles are not practical to current issues. I started it with practical issue which was not addressed for long time in India. Achieving in other sectors can't give solution to problematic sectors.
Dear Ali Ahmadi,
Yes the advise is really helpful and your points are correct. You have given nice articles for me to come up with good analysis. Thanks again for your valuable comments.
- Badges
- Science topic