Elijah is correct. Quality control is still not enough. ISMN usually provides in situ soil water content (SWC) measured by dielectric sensors. However, these SWC, especially those close to the ground surface include clear diurnal changes mainly caused by the temperature effects of dielectric sensors. We are trying to eliminate these temperature effects in SWC (Kapilaratne and Lu, 2017).
Kapilaratne and Lu. 2017. Automated general temperature correction method for dielectric sensors, Journal of Hydrology 551:203–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.050
1. In-situ data (mostly point measurements) - Check with International Soil Moisture Network (https://ismn.geo.tuwien.ac.at/)
2. Second option is model derived data (gloabl data often comes in coarse resolution)- Look for GLDAS (https://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/gldas/)
3. Third option is satellite soil moisture products.
SMAP is the state-of-art mission (https://nsidc.org/). You can have surface (~ top 5 cm) soil moisture data at 36 km and 9 km resolution. Also, you can use SMOS, AMSR-E, ASCAT datasets. They give soil moisture data at coarse resolutions (~25 km - 40 km).