This presentation of the formation on the solar system depends on the conclusion that the universe is older than 13.8 billion years. The estimated age of the original galaxies which formed the Milky Way galaxy is around 100 billion years.

Typically galaxy mergers take upwards of 20 billion years and the first mergers resulted in star formation. The merger of galaxies with stars which have already formed leads to the formation of binary and multiple star systems and rotating stars. Angular momentum is important in this analysis because the solar system formed from a rotating cloud in which the angular momentum was too great to form a single stable star and too small to result in a binary star system.

The hypothesis is that as the rotating cloud collapsed under gravity, it rotated faster and faster and a body of material (perhaps between a tenth and on hundredth of the mass of the sun) was spun off into space. This rotating mass then followed an elliptical trajectory spinning off the material that formed the planets.

I am looking for support or criticism of this proposal by ResearchGate members. It does depend on the recent evidence from the JWST which suggests that the Big Bang theory is wrong.

I will add links to the presentation in my first comment.

Richard

More Richard Lewis's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions