Andre Luis Tomaz Dionísio

Andres, definitely a worthwhile topic you tackled here...

The search for deeper explanations of wave-particle duality and the quantum measurement problem remains an open and a fundamental part of Quantum Theory. That said, I’d like to offer a few critical points for consideration from a physics standpoint:

1. Dimensional Consistency and the Claim of Travel at c2

The suggestion that the “particle aspect” of light travels at c2 raises immediate dimensional and physical concerns. In SI units, c2 is not a speed but has units of energy per unit mass. If this is intended to imply a kind of “exponential” or emergent effect, perhaps metaphorically, I would recommend reframing it using more precise physical quantities. Otherwise, the claim appears to contradict special relativity, which firmly prohibits any propagation of mass-energy faster than c.

2. Photon Structure and the 2D Spiral on 1D Wave Concept

The idea of photons spiralling around a 1D wave is intriguing but currently lacks foundation in quantum electrodynamics (QED) or experimental evidence. Photons are modeled as point-like, massless bosons with no internal structure in the Standard Model. If this spiral is meant to represent polarisation or phase rotation, it may benefit from being expressed in terms of established properties like helicity or quantum spin states.

3. Synchronisation Mismatches and M@easurement

The notion that interference patterns arise from synchronisation mismatches between particles and a 3D measurement surface is novel, but the underlying mechanisms need clearer definition. What specific parameters are desynchronised — phase, frequency, proper time?

... Furthermore, how does this model reproduce the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics, particularly in delayed-choice or which-path scenarios?

4. Dimensional Hierarchy and Quantum Measurement

Your model touches on ideas reminiscent of holography and emergent spacetime (e.g., the AdS/CFT correspondence), where lower-dimensional dynamics encode higher-dimensional behaviour. If pursued further, these connections could potentially be formalised within existing theoretical frameworks. However, at present, the dimensional distinctions in your model seem more heuristic than operational.

5. Testability and Predictive Power

For this to gain traction may IO humbly suggest further development of:

• A mathematical formalism (even a toy model) expressing the dimensional dynamics.
• Clear predictions that diverge from standard quantum mechanics and could be tested experimentally.
• A defined ontology of particles, fields, and detectors within the proposed dimensional framework.

with best regards,

Harri