Dear Rachel McMurray, you'd better to give the methods for film preparation. Under this magnification, it seems that PCL films are rough, and have some pores. The addition of graphene improve the surface quality by reducing the roughess of the film and the two materials are compatible. Reagrds
I believe that some minor experimental differences in preparation of films by solvent casting (using acetone as solvent) could explain somewhat the porous aspect of the neat PCL film. You know all the details of experimental procedure (e.g., Did you use similar amounts of solution of PCL? the thickness of films was similar? /other parameters).
To evidence better graphite particles will be necessary to use higher SEM magnifications, and eventually to have the help of TEM analysis. The loading of graphene is not so high, maybe you have the possibility to test other solvents or to repeat the first experiment regarding the producing of neat PCL and PCL/graphite films.
Surface properties and biocompatibility of solvent-cast poly[-caprolactone] films
September 2004Biomaterials 25(19):4741-8
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.003
Dottori, M., Armentano, I., Fortunati, E. and Kenny, J.M. (2011), Production and properties of solvent‐cast poly(ε‐caprolactone) composites with carbon nanostructures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 119: 3544-3552. doi:10.1002/app.33033
How to get uniform thickness films by solvent casting method?