Here we see in the first video a very strong house with dynamic walls that simply presses against the seismic base just as buildings today simply press against the ground, which at the slightest shift tends to topple over entirely. Why does it topple and not break in two? Because the walls are very strong, stronger than the unsupported loads of the building.

A tipping moment in one direction rotates the building around on itself and another opposite direction moment coming from the now unstable static loads of the building suspended in the air oppose each other. If the cross-sections of the vertical walls can withstand this contrast of moments, then the structure will either overturn or return to its original position intact without damage. If they do not, it will be cut in two.

See video that withstood the two opposing moments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux8TzWYvuQ0

If we bolt the same building onto the seismic base or onto the ground, then it will neither topple nor lose its support from the ground so there will be no opposing moment from the unstable static loads since it will not topple. So nothing will happen to it or it will not tip over. See video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6og4VWFcGA

Now let's remove the strong walls and leave it with weaker corner walls and a beam at the top, and do the same experiment again without bolting it to the seismic base or ground.

We will see after some oscillations that the contrast of the two moments coming from the overturning moment and the unsustainable static loads broke both the beam and wall sections on the node.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-X4tF9C7SE

Let's now repeat the last experiment with the corner walls and the large beam on the roof but bolting the wall faces to the seismic base or to the ground to see if it will break again as the previous one did.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoM5pEy7n9Q&t=92s

Not the slightest damage, although the acceleration that shook it was three times the acceleration of the other one that broke.

Conclusion

If we bolt the building to the ground, then even during the earthquake it does not lose the support of the ground so its own unsustainable loads that broke it no longer break it because the ground supports them.

Civil engineers will say that their own buildings don't rise from the ground either.

That is correct.

But they don't lift not because there is no overturning moment in their own buildings but because the weak cross-sections of the beams are unable to lift the structure in the air and they break before they lift it like a reed breaks when a big fish bites it.

The house is not destroyed by the earthquake but by its own weight resisting the rotation of the momentum.

If you bolt it to the ground the overturning moment is deflected into the ground and the structure will not be damaged.

If the fish bites a little then the reed beam will get away with it due to the fact that it has some elasticity.

If the bite is sharp and strong it will break

More Ioannis Lymperis's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions