Hello,
I have read a paper about how to carry out meta-analysis in 5 datasets of microarray. The method they used is combing effect sizes. After they calculate the pooled effect size, they compare it with the standard error ( in the paper, they said "study-specific effect sizes were combined to obtain the pooled effect size and its stand error using the random effects inverse-variance technique. The z-statistic was computed as a ration of the pooled effect size to its standard error for each gene, and the result was compare with a standard normal distribution to obtain a nominal P value".
My question is: why do they need to compare effects size and standard error (z-statistics). How to calclulate the standard normal distribution to obtain a nominal P value? Why we have to compare beween that Z-statistic and the nominal P value? (If it is bigger or smaller, what does it mean?)
Please, help me to understand this. Thank you so much