Tighter border security has a dialectical impact on economic performance of a country. On one hand it is expensive, and may mean tighter visa policies. On the other hand, it will ensure secure and stable environment, boosting the confidence of investors and their outfits. However, physical wall/barriers sometime interrupt ecological balance.
Tighter border security has a dialectical impact on economic performance of a country. On one hand it is expensive, and may mean tighter visa policies. On the other hand, it will ensure secure and stable environment, boosting the confidence of investors and their outfits. However, physical wall/barriers sometime interrupt ecological balance.
When we forget about the premise that freedom has its limits, the abolition of complete competition and the decline in the productivity of the welfare state follows. As with all things, a balancing quality and cost matters. I think that it's good for a society to allow citizens to be able to compete each other beyond a line of the basic welfare once the a basic welfare is guaranted. If the basic welfare is igonored by any reason, unexpected social ills will come to us, I expect: Article The Dark Shadow of Virtual Reality
In many ways, security in all of its glory, should come first before any economic performance (or should we say growth in a broader sense) to be witnessed. Black markets, and/or any of the sorts, however, breeds well under strict regulation either state or national level. All in all, security is the ultimate condition even though it might come out later as we progress with economic growth.