Hello ,
When you have an area covered with a grid of VES resistivity points and whant to interpret them quantitatively . which method is the best to adopt ? Manual curve matching using the auxiliarypoint method? or direct sophisticated computer software for VES interpretation? or both of them together ? and why?
Regards.
Dr. Wadhah
Machine ( I prefer) Dr Wadhah ...
Old document : https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1313e/report.pdf
Both of them to gather (Manual curve matching using the auxiliarypoint method and direct sophisticated computer software for VES interpretation) along Hydro-geology information are significant
During VES resistivity curves interpretation.
Thank you Mr. Saffi for answering.
Best Regards
Wadhah
Dear Wadhah,
You can make use of the two techniques(manual and software). However, an understanding of the geology and hydrogeology of the area is important.
Thank you Mr. Okonkwo for answering , I completely agree with you.
Best Regards.
Wadhah
Why geologica and hydrogeological information lmportant during geophysical data interpretation? We confronted with data measurment in the karst aquifer due to high fluctuation of data. We were confused during WES field data inerpretion. We reviewed geology and hydrogeology of the area, after that we find the data highly fluctuated consist of karts aquifer. This issue proved during drilling of well.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Esthetics
- Interpretation