The solar system is characterised as a quantised lognormal distribution exhibiting spin-orbit coupling in my new paper: “The Hum: log-normal distribution and planetary–solar resonance”. Does this indicate that the solar-magnetically braked proto-planetary disc of the early solar system behaved (and planets still behave) analogously to sub-atomic and molecular structures under gravity?
Hi,
The Spin-orbit coupling in atomic systems is purely relativistic effect. Since the velocities involved in the solar system are nonrelativistic I would assume they would be different.
Thanks Ergin. I'm glad my question has a simple direct and comprehensible answer. Now I'll go back to trying to engage the interest of the celestial mechanics.
Yep. I gather astronomical spin-orbit coupling is a result of tidal forces; in the quantum mechanics of atoms, LS coupling is a relativistic effect.
Dear.
I can answer your question about the physics of traditional physical optics and the optics of a theory that everything I tested it proved the theory that Einteins sought theory of everything.
However in both the response and visions that level cosmic gravity and dominant force and only force other scenics bodies teem some relevance.
In a neutron star and black holes can appreciate the effect of the magnetic and electric field.
In the case of neutron stars can turn into a pulsating star, ie a source of photons of light or micronda very accurate.
In the case of black holes generates a beam of x-ray at the center of its axis of rotation.
Now comes the spin in the case of planets and so a sense of rotation taking as reference its own star but without a special sense the level of the cosmos.
Unlike the spin of a particle that had affected their magnetic profile from anywhere in the universe.
Ie it is attracted to the north pole in the land will be anywhere in the cosmos.
So as an extreme simplification can make an analogy between the planetary system and the structure of an atom.
From the perspective of an electron current physical and an elementary particular. with cargo homogeneously distributed in a sphere.
And that creates a magnetic field to move or electrostatic to be stopped.
This magnetic field depends on the direction of rotation of the electron and this is called spin.
In my work an electron and built by 5 vibrating stretched string, which moves a string composed of the same however rolled into threads fluid.
Ie the field and not be ethereal as has been treated but has a physical structure!
I hope I helped, that can collaborate'm disposition.
A bit. Actually I am coping with advertising of repulsive forces, coming from celestial liquid balls- like the Sun and Jupiter.
Gerard: "Yep. I gather astronomical spin-orbit coupling is a result of tidal forces"
My research indicates that tidal forces and gravitational orbital resonance alone won't account for the commensurabilities observed. I'm guessing that electro-magnetic coupling via the interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind - planetary magnetosphere interactions are also involved. There are long-term librations and cyclicities which lie in simple resonant/harmonic ratios to shorter term phenomena at timescales ranging from ~3600yrs down to 144 days or less.
Contrary to what people might think, the spin-orbit coupling is the reason behind the precession of the orbit of planets(Mercury). Look at the recent publication in AP&SS
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.4720
and follow its consequences from which one can determine the spin period of planets.
Arbab: Thank you for that interesting paper link. We also noticed simple numerical relations between the diameters of adjacent planets. I will study it with interest.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Physiology
- Physiological Processes
- Stress