It is obvious that substantive justice is moral. For procedural justice, it's not so clear, especially when procedural justice contradicts substantive justice (e.g., a mass murderer being released on a so-called technicality).
I believe that substantive justice and procedural justice, both must have a moral dimension
In other words, ideally they should agree on morality, substantive justice and morality.
Well Prof , this is where evidence comes , legally circumstantial makes a very subjective (may be governed by morals) have a stand ...
Society is a tricky dimension :) conformance is wrong , non-conformance is anti-social !!!!
I believe that substantive justice and procedural justice, both must have a moral dimension
In other words, ideally they should agree on morality, substantive justice and morality.
Sure. all aspects of justice must have multi-moral dimensions.
Emad
I think this paper is very useful :
http://www.apshus.usv.ro/arhiva/2016I/004.%20pp.%2043-58.pdf
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Moral Philosophy