Organic farming is very much popular. World population is nearly 7.8 billion now a days. So is it possible for the organic farming to ensure the food security of these 7.8 billion people?
Dear Md Mostofa Mahbub Organic farming creates more profit and yields healthier produce. It’s time it played the role it deserves in feeding a rapidly growing world population. One Ex....
In 1971, then US Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz uttered these unsympathetic words: “Before we go back to organic agriculture in this country, somebody must decide which 50 million Americans we are going to let starve or go hungry.” Since then, critics have continued to argue that organic agriculture is inefficient, requiring more land than conventional agriculture to yield the same amount of food. Proponents have countered that increasing research could reduce the yield gap, and organic agriculture generates environmental, health and socioeconomic benefits that can’t be found with conventional farming.
Organic agriculture occupies only 1% of global agricultural land, making it a relatively untapped resource for one of the greatest challenges facing humanity: producing enough food for a population that could reach 10 billion by 2050, without the extensive deforestation and harm to the wider environment.
That’s the conclusion my doctoral student Jonathan Wachter and I reached in reviewing 40 years of science and hundreds of scientific studies comparing the long term prospects of organic and conventional farming. The study, Organic Agriculture in the 21st Century, published in Nature Plants, is the first to compare organic and conventional agriculture across the four main metrics of sustainability identified by the US National Academy of Sciences: be productive, economically profitable, environmentally sound and socially just. Like a chair, for a farm to be sustainable, it needs to be stable, with all four legs being managed so they are in balance.
We found that although organic farming systems produce yields that average 10-20% less than conventional agriculture, they are more profitable and environmentally friendly. Historically, conventional agriculture has focused on increasing yields at the expense of the other three sustainability metrics.
In addition, organic farming delivers equally or more nutritious foods that contain less or no pesticide residues, and provide greater social benefits than their conventional counterparts.
With organic agriculture, environmental costs tend to be lower and the benefits greater. Biodiversity loss, environmental degradation and severe impacts on ecosystem services – which refer to nature’s support of wildlife habitat, crop pollination, soil health and other benefits – have not only accompanied conventional farming systems, but have often extended well beyond the boundaries of their fields, such as fertilizer runoff into rivers.
Overall, organic farms tend to have better soil quality and reduce soil erosion compared to their conventional counterparts. Organic agriculture generally creates less soil and water pollution and lower greenhouse gas emissions, and is more energy efficient. Organic agriculture is also associated with greater biodiversity of plants, animals, insects and microbes as well as genetic diversity.
Despite lower yields, organic agriculture is more profitable (by 22–35%) for farmers because consumers are willing to pay more. These higher prices essentially compensate farmers for preserving the quality of their land.
Studies that evaluate social equity and quality of life for farm communities are few. Still, organic farming has been shown to create more jobs and reduce farm workers’ exposure to pesticides and other chemicals.
Organic farming can help to both feed the world and preserve wildland. In a study published this year, researchers modeled 500 food production scenarios to see if we can feed an estimated world population of 9.6 billion people in 2050 without expanding the area of farmland we already use. They found that enough food could be produced with lower-yielding organic farming, if people become vegetarians or eat a more plant-based diet with lower meat consumption. The existing farmland can feed that many people if they are all vegan, a 94% success rate if they are vegetarian, 39% with a completely organic diet, and 15% with the Western-style diet based on meat.
Realistically, we can’t expect everyone to forgo meat. Organic isn’t the only sustainable option to conventional farming either. Other viable types of farming exist, such as integrated farming where you blend organic with conventional practices or grass-fed livestock systems.
More than 40 years after Earl Butz’s comment, we are in a new era of agriculture.During this period, the number of organic farms, the extent of organically farmed land, the amount of research funding devoted to organic farming and the market size for organic foods have steadily increased. Sales of organic foods and beverages are rapidly growing in the world, increasing almost fivefold between 1999 and 2013 to $72bn. This 2013 figure is projected to double by 2018. Closer to home, organic food and beverage sales in 2015 represented almost 5% of US food and beverage sales, up from 0.8% in 1997.
Scaling up organic agriculture with appropriate public policies and private investment is an important step for global food and ecosystem security. The challenge facing policymakers is to develop government policies that support conventional farmers converting to organic systems. For the private business sector, investing in organics offers a lot of entrepreneurial opportunities and is an area of budding growth that will likely continue for years to come.
In a time of increasing population growth, climate change and environmental degradation, we need agricultural systems that come with a more balanced portfolio of sustainability benefits. Organic farming is one of the healthiest and strongest sectors in agriculture today and will continue to grow and play a larger part in feeding the world. It produces adequate yields and better unites human health, environment and socioeconomic objectives than conventional farming. John Reganold is a Regents Professor of Soil Science & Agroecology at the Washington State University.
Organic agriculture can combat desertification by decreasing erosion and improving water uptake and retention. Organic agriculture also helps to increase resistance to pests and diseases, which is crucial to building food security
Yes, definitely. But not the commercialized /globalised trade in monoculture organics which may be as unsustainable as non organics. Instead, we need to rethink our entire food system to make it more resilient. We need to make steps to promote regenerative, agriecological practices, food sovereignty and community empowerment.
Yes, it contributes alot. It cuts off the production cost while still maximizing the produce. Myself have changed to organic farming and it produces more.
Highly probable, Organic farming is not a single standalone approacH. It can benefit from many crop rotation and protection techniques. If it is managed properly (in terms of increasing farm labor) or we mixed it with other approach (regenerative farming), there is high chance of producing the same amount of yield in the short-term and of course keeping farm and its workers healthy in the long-term.
Highly improbable to provide complete "food security" especially toward the food availability component. Population growth races ahead of global output/productivity; hence, the justification for intensification/efficiency of production.
However, organic farming has a significant role to the global panacea of food insecurity
Organic farming can help in attaining the QUALITY SUSTAINABILITY aspect of food security. While to to achieve Quantitative food sustainability some concept of inorganic farming such as plantation farming & Mechanisation need to be inculcated to a relatively lesser extent
Proper use of resources inside an organic farming scheme can indeed ensure food security. However it has to become a standard in agriculture, and it is far from being close to that. Too many people still believe what the schools continue to teach, and what large corporations continue to promote (for their own interest), i.e. monoculture with minimal rotations, and an armada of the so gently named "crop protection" tools (all the ...-cides") without any consideration that ecosystems are more resilient and productive than man directed systems. Men still don't know how to create a soil, and yet believe they master agriculture...
Yes.the main concept of organic farming is avoid use of the external input such as pesticides ,GMO,growth hormones . There for always helps to food security .
Proper use of resources inside an organic farming scheme can indeed ensure food security. However it has to become a standard in agriculture, and it is far from being close to that. Too many people still believe what the schools continue to teach, and what large corporations continue to promote (for their own interest), i.e. monoculture with minimal rotations, and an armada of the so gently named "crop protection" tools (all the ...-cides") without any consideration that ecosystems are more resilient and productive than man directed systems. Men still don't know how to create a soil, and yet believe they master agriculture...
Organic farming is not bad at all. It is possible that organic farming can ensure food security but its very expensive to implement. Most farmers in Africa are smallholders with limited access to improved farm inputs such as organic fertilizer, etc. these farmers are unable to afford these inputs. also, it is not easy to differentiate between organic food and inorganic food in the market. therefore, people will still produce inorganic food and supply them under the pretends of organic food.
People with low income will not be able to afford organic foods. evidence is the case of why most Africans patronize fake products from China. Organic farming with regards to animal production may also be very difficult due to the introduction of exotic breeds which requires some article chemicals to grow well.
The answer is NO. The organic farming is unproductive, it cant reach the high yields needed; needed by farmers to increase income and reduce costs, and needed by mankind to ensure food security.
Organic farming is exclude use of synthetic chemical fertilizer and pesticides so as to maintain ecological balance I.e. ideal interaction between biotic and abiotic factors...
India is the second largest populated country after China which is expected to cross 1.3 billion by 2025..... to feed this ever increasing population of India, there is need to supply nutrients in adequate quantities and suitable proportions...
Solely dependence on organic farming may not provide that much remunerative return as it favours number of constraints like...
Availability of organic manure like cow dung, poultry manure, vermicompost etc are very less as preparation of these manure are tough as compared to synthetic industrial manufactured chemicals...
These organic manure especially bulky one has to be applied in a very higher quantity like 5 t/ha, 10 t/ha or more than that as they contain very less amount of primary and secondary nutrients...
Also these nutrients release and supply nutrients very slowly and in very less amount...therefore need time to cover up the gap..means very late response is observed by the crop plants in order to sustain growth and yield...on the other hand application of small amount of synthetic chemicals may results in quick response ....
However there is need to integrate organic amendment with these synthetic chemicals in an ideal proportion so that soil quality may be maintained... I.e. integrated nutrient management...
I would rather to change the question: Conventional agriculture is capable of ensure food security? How it is possible that actually agriculture has achieved the biggest yields per hectare in its history, but there are more than 800 millions of hunger people in the world?
In South America more than 70% that available soil for agriculture is destined for livestock production, 20% for agroindustry and less than 10% for human consumption; this is the origin of food insecurity, it is not a matter of yields but of land use; agriculture has become a business and only those who can afford, have food security.
The use of chemical inputs like fertilizers and pesticides is a highly profitable business and those who produce them are interested in maintain the "idea" that they are necessary to guarantee food security, but those chemicals are poisoning humans and ecosystems and they are not sustainable in the long term.
It is time to rethink the consumption habits especially in developed countries where the demand of meat and other commodities are so high and undeveloped countries destines their best lands to supply that demand, instead of use them to feed their people.
Organic farming products , always help the increase in food quality and human heath. But campare with world population situation ,organic farming products are not eenough for fullfill the human consumption. As well as in organic farming, not use for synthetic input like synthetic fertilizer, growth hormones, pesticide and etc. There fore yield not increase and that yield can't fullfill the human needs . It effect to the food security. Finally , organic farming is help to enhance the human health but not increase food security .
I know the present scenario of the agriculture is like a foggy atmosphere. People know that there are risks and vulnerability with the present methods and techniques but still they are going forward without knowing and awareness of the shocks and disasters ahead. The chemical farming is like a addiction people know it's harmful but not willing to leave. And the system which is running by the big powers they are getting the benefit from the trade of human health and life through this highly effective but stealth weapon. The concept seeding during the 1960s was so intensive that people think a more application of chamicals will increase the productivity. But it is no such a easy or simple things to increase the productivity. But by applying a huge chamicals we can ensure a drastic reduction in the yield and productivity. Then the question comes what will be the alternative? Is it the organic movement? Actually now in the present scenario the answer is no. The soil conditions of the country now is too much I'll that it cannot achieve the proposed production to feed the entire population. But a slow approach through having a risk storage of grains. The movement toward the organic should be well planed. The reduction of production of first 3years can be calculated and according to that the risk storage can be done. And a slow transformation of 10% land each year can be converted. And the lands which captivating for atleast 3 years in organic approach can rejuvenate and bring a projected and desirable production which can quanch the need of the entire population. And if any one have any doubts about the ability of the organic approach to produce I will like it tell it can produce enough and more than the chamical farming which will be safe, sustainable, healthy and functional. For your reference you can go through the papers mentioned below -
Пока результаты показали, что только органическое сельское хозяйство не сможет решить проблему продовольственной безопасности страны. Это привилно, но такие растения есть как соя, оно засаленность почву снижает, почву обогошает биологическим азотом и гумусам
The match between organic farming and food security is very difficult. But, if systematic approach could be taken over a long period of time food security is possible to certain extent.
The current importance of ecological agriculture stems from the following advantages of this cultivation system: less contaminated air, water and agricultural food products; safe working conditions for farmers; biodiversity; fertile and healthy soul; reduction of the loss of nutrients due to leaching; reduction in soil erosion; efficient use of water resources; nutrient quality of ecological products; environmental protection; less extensive use of non-renewable resources; reduction of risks for farmers; protection of the future generations; and economic advantages.
Ecological agriculture has been constantly developing in recent years across all the continents but organic farming cannot feed the world.
Organic farming may not insure you that much food whhich is going waste daily in many restaurants and kitchens, but it will definately insure you your good health and elongate your life.....